User talk:Robinsonvaughn

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! TheoloJ (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Perioperative beta blockade
A tag has been placed on Perioperative beta blockade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheoloJ (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. If you do mean to donate the aerticle to the PD, you must d t explicitly license the rights to the material according to our licensing using the CC-BY-SA and the GNU  licenses, as explained in WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:Donating copyrighted materials ; these  give everyone in the world an irrevocable license to reuse and alter the material, even for commercial purposes. This can be done either by sending an email to our OTRS service, or by putting a note on the page that it is either PD or CC-by SA--as fully explained on the links above. However, the article is not  satisfactory anyway -- it needs to be rewritten in a more encyclopedic  way. it has to give facts, and when giving opinions, it has to give the sources. On your web page, it's appropriate for you to give n evaluation of the evidence and recommendations-- on Wikipedia it is not, however expert you may be. You can only give them with explicit links to published sources. You cannot for example say "Review articles and meta-analyses appeared in journals from Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Anesthesiology, and surgical subspecialties." -- you have to give the exact refs, though there is no point in listing them all. You cannot say "The AHA/ACC adressed the issue in their 2001 recommendations for perioperative care in a careful fashion, but called the evidence for beta-blocking patients at risk for cardiac events "Level Two A" - which is not conclusive, but the weight of the evidence or expert opinion is in favor of the intervention." but give the reference. Nor can you say "With such impressive NNTs and such a high profile, perioperative beta blockade became an "evidence-based" recommendation. " --this is evaluation, and we do not do that in our articles. You might want to consult with some of the members of WP:WikiProject Medicine, or examine articles listed there as Featured Articles or Good Articles. in short, the Wikipedia article is not to advocate the therapy, or to evaluate it, but to give information about it--there's a difference. please rewrite and try again. If you wish to quote any part of your web page--and some of it is probably usable--you still have to either give formal permission or mark the webpage itself as PD. Hope this helps.  DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)