User talk:Robomilk/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 19:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

user page
It is felt that the article you created at Shaun hargreaves is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifiable. I have moved it to User:, which is where users are free to write about themselves. You are at liberty to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it is likely to be nominated for deletion.

Note, however, that the purpose of a user page is to enable active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing is likely to be removed.

Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information. -- RHaworth 01:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Netmag154.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Netmag154.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

List of unusual deaths
Hi, I just undid your addition to Unusual deaths because a number of celebrities went out in just this way. Red Foxx died exactly like this, an Opera singer died with some lyric like "I could just die" (collapsing off a ladder), and I just removed another entry about a comedian that died on stage and fell on Milton Bearle. I guess it's a popular way to go. NJGW (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Subpages
Several of the new pages you've created have been redirected to the existing page Bristol City Council elections, because sub-pages are not allowed in article space. The reasons for this are laid out in the guideline Subpages. If a page becomes too large (see guidance at WP:SPLIT for when this is the case), you can create separate pages for sub-topics, but each page must stand on its own as a proper, independent encyclopedia article, with context, and it's usually a good idea to seek consensus if it's possible that someone might disagree with the split. — swpb T 18:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * In which case, what is the intended means of DRY-ly storing identical data that needs to appear on multiple different pages in potentially different contexts? I assumed a subpage would be okay, on the basis that this is part of that but needs to be logistically separate. A speedy answer would be appreciated, as the removal/redirection of those pages has now broken the formatting of Bristol City Council, Politics of Bristol and History of Bristol City Council. Thanks. Robomilk (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * What I can tell you is this: the decision that sub-pages are unacceptable was made a long time ago, and is regularly reaffirmed; there is no real possibility of it being changed. Sometimes, that means you do have to repeat yourself a little, or at least summarize, to establish context on a related set of articles, but you can also use templates like main to point to articles on different aspects of a parent topic (a lengthy table, for instance, should never be duplicated on multiple pages). But in this case, there is no justification on the basis of article length or subject-matter for splitting these tables out into separate pages. — swpb T 18:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Yikes. As a person whose job involves eradicating repetition as much as possible that kind of makes me cringe. Hopefully it's something that's relaxed or otherwise dealt with technologically in the future. I'll fix up the broken pages and see about reducing repetition somehow. (Given we just had three different elections a few days ago, maintaining and updating so many tables is a complete pain in the ass. May as well try and nip it in the bud.) Robomilk (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't see how you have to maintain any more tables than you would otherwise. Print encyclopedias repeat summary-level content all the time; it's how encyclopedias work. There is simply no possible need for you to use slash-titled sub-pages to avoid repetition. We've been doing this a long, long time, and it's been working very, very well. — swpb T 18:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I must disagree. It's not necessarily summary data, and there is obvious utility to having data be able to be transcluded wholesale. Currently information on the current council control is listed on two pages, current council composition is on two, historical council composition is on two. Along with other (council-unrelated) tables, this amounts to 14 tables of data where there could be six, all repeated on a mere four pages. All of this data is identical and needs to be updated at the same time, so maintaining it from a central location is just sensible. I very much doubt a print encyclopaedia would repeat the same table of information for three pages straight. Robomilk (talk) 19:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Look—I don't care how you do it, but you can't use sub-pages. That's all there is to it. I don't think you're even listening to me--I'm not suggesting you repeat tables--so I'm not inclined to keep the conversation up. You can figure this out yourself. — swpb T 19:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I never said I was going to use sub-pages. If I may repeat myself: "Hopefully it's something that's relaxed or otherwise dealt with technologically in the future. I'll fix up the broken pages and see about reducing repetition somehow." I'm simply saying there is definite utility to being able to store repetitive information at a central location and it's a shame that Wikipedia has no process for doing so, which you appeared to disagree with. I was not arguing that sub-pages should necessarily be the answer to that; thus my "otherwise dealt with technologically" bit—a future MediaWiki update could possibly accomplish it much more neatly for all I know.
 * Regardless, it seems I'm now embarking of a widescale rewrite of a large number of pages to try and reduce repeating data as much as possible. This'll be fun. Robomilk (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ESPosthumus-Makara-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ESPosthumus-Makara-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)