User talk:Robpbrown89

Welcome!
Hello, Robpbrown89, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Accutronics Ltd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Accutronics Ltd


A tag has been placed on Accutronics Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Disclosure of employment
Hello Robpbrown89. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Accutronics Ltd, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Robpbrown89. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I don't object in principle to restoring the deleted text to a user sub-page, but you should read the following so that you are aware of the problems you still face
 * You have declared your conflict of interest as a paid editor, but that doesn't mean you can write what you like, you don't own the article. You are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
 * You did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Most of your references were the company's own pages, press releases or sites repeating what the company claims or interviewing its management.
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Most, if not all, of your existing references do not meet the criteria.


 * Your article is all about what you sell, little about the company itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Your article, as I said above, is just about what you sell, spammy by definition
 * Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: organised to fit their customers’ expectations, providing a cradle-to-grave service from initial design concepts to aftermarket support... made the company an even stronger strategic supply partner... Accutronics offer strong market reach in North American and Asian portable device markets...—and so on, spam, spam spam.


 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. I didn't check because it was obvious spam anyway, but note that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Bearing in mind that you will have to completely re-reference your text and write a neutral encyclopaedia artcile instead of company spam, do you still wish me to restore the deleted text (minus the most blatant spam)? Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)