User talk:Robruiz

Image copyright problem with Image:UJAT logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:UJAT logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:UJATlogo.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:UJAT logo.jpg. The copy called Image:UJAT logo.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

New logo
It is preferable to contact me via my user talk page, since it's a simple matter here to create links to references. >>SORRY, I WAS NOT COMFORTABLE WITH THIS USER TALK FEATURE; STILL LEARNING IT...

My suggestion was not for you to locate a lower resolution version from somewhere, but to use freely available graphics tools to reduce the scale (and therefore the resolution) of the image yourself. This is a trivial operation to carry out. As it happens, the image is still too big. There's no reason for a fair use image to be any larger than the size at which its displayed in the article. (160px in this case, but there's no reason for it to be less than 200px.) You furthermore had no need to upload the smaller version under a different title. It would have been easier all around to upload it over the old, larger one. >>> THE IMAGE IS ALREADY 160PX, WHICH IS ALREADY LESS THAN THE 200PX TARGET YOU ARE ALLUDING TO ABOVE. SEEMS TO ME IT COMPLIES WITH EVERYTHING NEEDED. AS FOR THE VARIOUS VERSIONS AND TITLES, ETC., I WAS JUST LEARNIONG THE SYSTEM BACK THEN AND MADE SOME MISTAKES ALONG THE WAY. MY GOAL IS TO HAVE A SINGLE IMAGGE UPLOADED WITH THE PREFERRED NAME OF UJATLOGO.JPG(THIS IS IN FOLLOWING WITH YOUR NAMING RECOMMENDATIONS, (NAMELY, "in order to prevent duplicate names").

Your fair use rationale is somewhat deficient, and the new image is likely to get tagged for deletion on that basis. You would be better off using, which can provide the usual fair use rationale that applies to 99% of the logos on the site if you just fill in a few parameters. TCC (talk) (contribs) 10:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC) >>> I DID USE THAT {LOGO FUR} YOU MENTION. DOUBLE-CLICKING THE IMAGE THEN UNDER FILE HISTORY > COMMENTS WILL TAKE YOU TO. HOW IS THE IMAGE AND RATIONALE I PROVIDE ANY DIFFERENT THAN THOSE OF OTHER UNIVERSITIES? (SEE, FOR EXAMPLE. UNAM'S IMAGE SIZE (1060 × 1181 RESOLUTION AT 200PX)AND ITS IDENTICAL RATIONALE AT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Autonomous_University_of_Mexico)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UJATlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:UJATlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UJATlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:UJATlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism? on Puerto Rican article
Re your message on Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism: I removed the edit in question and another vandalism edit. Reporting vandalism there is not the appropriate place. Instead, you can revert the change yourself and then report it to WP:AIV should admin intervention be necessary. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cunduacán
I have nominated Cunduacán, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Cunduacán. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Niaz (Talk •  Contribs)  17:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The nominator, User:Niaz, decided to withdraw the nomination and the deletion discussion has been closed. — Travis talk  02:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

No way to fix article
there seems to be no way to fix this article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Booksources&isbn=0718821645

I could find no "edit this page" tab, and no "discussion" tab. the problem is that when the table of contents is in shown mode, the map of the world to the left covers the toc making it impossible to view it.