User talk:Robsam12

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Ellis (actor), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Your contribution to the Peter Ellis (actor)‎ article is appreciated. It is good to see the rest of his career being added.

There is a policy on Wikipedia of Verifiability, everything on Wikipedia should be backed up by citations. Your recent edits and reversions removed the only two citations that were already associated with the article. You may have noticed the (Tag: references removed) appearing in the edit history, which is what originally drew my attention to your recent edits.

Another rule is that articles should be written in prose not in list format. Although the content was not great to start with, your recent edits removed the prose section leaving the article as just a list of appearances.

I am reverting the removed paragraphs and citations again but please note, I am only restoring these because they are valid, fully cited paragraphs. Your edits do not go far enough to replace them as yet. You are totally at liberty to rewrite the article, giving more emphasis to the non-Bill work but remember to add citations as you go. You may also like to read the Wikipedia Manual of Style.

Happy editing. Putney Bridge (talk) 00:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)