User talk:Robynthehode/Archives/2020/March

Welcome


Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.


 * Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
 * The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
 * Quick Introductions to:
 * Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
 * Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
 * Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
 * Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
 * Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?


 * What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?

 * If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
 * If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
 * If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
 * For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

Articles for deletion/List of jesters
I went ahead and corrected your formatting for this AFD. Your rationale seems sound; I left it alone and just tinkered with the formatting. I also listed it at the AFD log, so that it will show up on the list of debates. In that way, other editors who might not care about Jesters themselves but who review AFDs can come and give their opinion on this debate. If you have any questions about what I did or why, please leave me a note on my talk page. Thanks! UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm SQGibbon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jester, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 16:55, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of jugglers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alex Barron and Steve Mills (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fire performance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Circus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roman and Astley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Jester/Fools
Hi, I wonder if I could ask your advice, please? I noticed that you keep an eye on the Jester article and you mentioned on the talk page about possibly doing an article on 'Fools' so thought you might be the best person to ask! I've been playing around with an article for Jamie Fleeman, the Laird of Udny's Fool and he is frequently described as the "last family jester in Scotland". I think the article is getting near ready to be moved from my draft to main space. Do you feel it would be appropriate to include a link under the 'Notable jesters' section of the Jester article? SagaciousPhil  -  Chat  09:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for such a fast response! I've moved it to main space and added it to jester and the list of Jesters as well - now I'll see if I can come up with a DYK hook for it.  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  18:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Kingdom of Great Britain
Hi. I have opened a discussion regarding the wording of the introduction of the Kingdom of Great Britain article where the partition of Ireland is mentioned. We discussed this a few months ago, and agreed on the current wording however I don't think it's accurate. I would appreciate your input. Regards, Rob (talk) 19:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Equilibristics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Risley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Clock Towers concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Clock Towers, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Clock Towers


Hello Robynthehode. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "List of Clock Towers".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hooping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Torch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraffin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=599473093 your edit] to Torch (juggling) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * and/or metal with a wick attached at one end. The wick is impregnated with a flammable substance usually paraffin and ignited before use.

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Torch (juggling), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraffin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Repetitions
Repetitions can lead to confusion. Having done this edit, if you wanted to make sure that Dangerfirebob saw it, rather than repeat the message at User talk:Dangerfirebob it would have been to better to place there. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=608964521 your edit] to Milad Tower may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Tallest structures, freestanding structures, and buildings|17th tallest freestanding structure] in the world. Andrew Burke, Mark Elliott. Iran (Lonely Planet Country Guide). p. 114.

Washington Monument
Sorry it took me a while to get back to you on this discussion. You may be right about how the Washington Monument isn't the tallest obelisk in the world and I know that Wikipedia shouldn't be used as a reference itself, however Wikipedia shouldn't contradict itself or be redundant. Giving two different facts on the same topic in an encyclopedia isn't right. It needs to be either one or the other. And the San Jacinto Monument article names it as a column. So there are some really contradicting articles here and I want to get this right. Leoesb1032 (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Dan Bahat
Robyn, I hoped this could be avoided. There is a system introduced by Wikipedia where a term of larger interest, which does not have an article yet (no contradiction there, it happens a lot), is introduced nevertheless and it appears in red, signalling that it needs to be addressed. This system usually works, somebody sees it, "What, no article yet?!", takes the time and deals with it. The more "red flags", the more likely it is to happen. It is part of Wikipedia. On the very page you keep on stubbornly deleting this tiny detail, there are two more "red flags" which don't seem to bother you - and rightfully so (the Great Stele of Axum and the Jupiter temple of Baalbek). I hope I didn't give you any wrong ideas now, Axum and Baalbek are great places :-) Usually people older than 16-17-18 learn that they don't possess all wisdom. That truth isn't black and white. That you can have the last word and look silly, or let go and look smart. That your explanation "It hasn't got an article, so I remove it" doesn't stand up to ration. Often you can either have the last word, or be mature. It's all yours from here on. PS: Not all "terms" are juggling clubs or stone monoliths. Dan Bahat is a HIGHLY regarded, accomplished, kind and relatively old person. He deserves to be popularized, professionally for sure and otherwise also. I've made the same intervention on a dozen other pages in more prominent places than the list of references on an overview list on monoliths. Nobody else removed him. Draw your own conclusions. "Online" can be very real, not at all "virtual". Have a good year, Arminden (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Arminden Great. Thanks, good for everyone!Arminden (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Arminden

Juggling
Xharm is blocked as a sock puppet of a sock puppeteer, "Supersaiyen312". I was only reverting the edits because they fall under WP:EVADE.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Unicycle Links
Yes you are right. No limits on Wikilinks. Was doing a clear out on various articles of external links which were dead, incorrect or promotional and I was too keen. However a list a manufacturers is not very informative without a link at all. Maybe those that aren't Wikilinked should go -Robynthehode (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I agree with you about the list items that do not link to a separate article. That is the criteria in the List of bicycle brands and manufacturing companies and Tandem bicycle articles. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

You must be mistaken
I did not try to "change the title" of the pages. You see, there is two ways to write the full titles. Star Wars Episode X: Subtitle and Star Wars: Episode X - Subtitle. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 19:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slacklining, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tension. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Accidental revert
Sorry, I didn't mean to revert your change at List of tallest buildings in the world. Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  13:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Street performance
Hello. You've been here for about 6 years, but you only have a mere 758 edits, of which 625 are to articles. I've been here for 11 years, and I have over 118,000 article edits. I suggest that you don't really know what the fuck you're doing, and what your're getting involved in, and that with my moving of the disputed sentence to another section, away from the "one-man-band" paragraph, that it would be best for you call it a victory and move along.If not, so be it. BMK (talk) 08:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, asshole, stop fucking around. BMK (talk) 14:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've struck my rude remark, and offer my sincere apologies for my middle-of-the-night tirade. It was uncalled for, and was certainly not civil or collegial. BMK (talk) 21:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
 * Please see WP:AN3 which includes a warning to both of you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I entirely sympathise with you. You have been bullied by a long-term editor who should know much, much better and who is enjoying a kind of immunity that many other editors never see.  The gratuitous and overt personal attacks on you were something that many editors would be blocked for, and it's an interesting insight into his behaviour that, once warned by a couple of people, and despite his "eleven years" of experience here, he suddenly redacted his abuse.  He has spent a long time criticising me for being "a jerk" and "one of the worst admins on Wikipedia" but I'm proud to say that I have never stooped to his gutter-level of personal attacks and indignation.  I hope you aren't entirely put off by the experience, needless to say you should feel encouraged to continue to work here collaboratively, and not be dissuaded by the few bad apples.  All the best.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello Robynthehode. This is a reply to your comment at the edit warring board. There is no implication that you are a bad editor, though you made more than three reverts. That is is against the rules. Since admin actions should be even-handed, we need to point out the problems with your edits as well as with BMK's. Per WP:NOTTHEM another editor's misbehavior doesn't get you off the hook. We'll be expecting both you and BMK to follow the edit warring rules in the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

1000 million
There isn't such a thing as 1000 million because 1000 million is a billion I looked it up. Your response made no sense. Oppenheimer2277 (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Clown
re this, please specify what content exactly you think has been removed (I am not aware of having done so and will be happy to restore such content if it is pointed out), and, if possible, how that edit summary is itself an explanation for the removal of referenced content on your part. Thank you. --dab (𒁳) 11:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Unicycle International Events
could I create a page for the specific international event then? --Krazio (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Skyscraper merge proposals
It is not appropriate to use revert on a good faith edit WP:REVERT. There has been an open topic on the talk page to gather feedback on this merge proposal as per WP:MERGE. That would be the place to comment. There is an extensive Afd discussion on one of the articles that will give some background to the proposal. By way of disclosure, I have no affiliation with either website, only passing involvement as an editor in the articles and topic area. Wiki-psyc (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The talk page section has not reached consensus for the merge. I will comment there but have reverted your edit because it does not add anything to the article and in parts adds unimportant detail Robynthehode (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * In the interim, please do not remove the merge banners. Surely you are familiar with WP:PAM Thanks. Wiki-psyc (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Re 'British' isles edit
"Did the 'Irish' really arrive with the Anglo Saxons. Were they a distinct people?" They arrived a little earlier than the Anglo-Saxons, which is why they Anglo-Saxons were invited to Britain in the first place. Yes they were and are a distinct people. Fergananim (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

My apologies
I meant to revert only your edit in the "Climate" section of mountain range with this edit; I also got your edits confused with the one immediately before yours, which had added a hatnote about massif. I reinstated the good part of your edit, and I apologize for the minor mess.— Gorthian (talk) 18:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. I won't change the article again as we will need to discuss this but I still believe 'climate' is the wrong terminology. See the Wikipedia article on Climate. The way the section in the mountain range article about climate is written seems to be talking about weather not climate. Robynthehode (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

comment requested about List of future tallest buildings in the world
Hi, could you possibly please reply at Talk:List of future tallest buildings in the world? I don't get what are the criteria for list inclusion, hence your edits about Azerbaijan and now also Morocco buildings. I assume the criteria have been well-discussed and defined by consensus somewhere, but the Talk page does not reflect that. Thanks for your attention! -- do ncr  am  22:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Darth Fener
I wonder why you removed my contribution to the page Darth Vader. Maybe the information should go in some other part of page, but it is not true that it is not relevant. In fact, many America people are confused when they heard of "Darth Fener" because they do not know where it originates. They think is a character of a spin-off of the series. It is not. So, I think it should be added somewhere in that page. It is relevant to that character anyway.--Dejudicibus (talk) 18:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Pantomime
You may wish to comment on the open threads at the Talk page, one of which you commented on some months ago. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big top. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

List of tallest structures in the world by country
I don't believe you actually checked what changes I have made to the page List of tallest structures in the world by country. They included expanding several of the sections, removing buildings that were under construction and under 100m, and removing tables so that the article was consistently formatted. I have contacted User:Hexafluoride and requested the assistance of an administrator. You ought to have responded to the concerns (now several) on the Talk:List of tallest structures in the world by country before making these changes. Hayek79 (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Other factors section on causes of WW1
Agree with your comments, editors have now had over three weeks to comment so I have again made those changes. I welcome your comments on the talk page of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Johnston (talk • contribs) 19:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Vikas Uppal page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=747069375 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F747069375%7CVikas Uppal%5D%5D Ask for help])

Discussion at Darth Vader
You are invited to join the discussion at Darth Vader. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Discussion
I would like to discuss about something here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.86.255.128 (talk) 00:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Padme Amidala
I have started a discussion on Padme Amidala in the talk section of Star Wars: Episode VIII. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Revert
See here You undid a sourced addition for some reason and I suppose you also didn't realize that I removed these HTML comments which can be easily missed to an editnotice which will appear to everyone who edits the page in a browser. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Snoke Revert
I notice about an hour ago you undid my edit on The Force Awakens page creating a like for Supreme Leader Snoke. I have written an article I feel is adequate for the character, which by adequate I mean is alright but can use some improvement. Considering you are quite active in the realm of Star Wars, would you read my Snoke arcticle. I will post it here, and please feel free to make any changes you like. Thanks.Count Awesome 7:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Truth revert
How do you propose to deal with the problem I alluded to in the edit reason for the edit you reverted? &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. No problem with sources but the source you used seemed to be unreliable because it was a Q & A website and you used an aggregate from this source to support your argument. This aggregate also seemed to be original research (not allowed in Wikipedia) rather than a direct citation. Robynthehode (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay in replying - I have not made much time for WP recently. The edit in question, since it was some time ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Truth&diff=prev&oldid=769943000
 * It seems to me that a source that would not normally meet the standards of RS is better than no source at all, when the claim being supported would stand without a source, as the claim did before. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Carrie Fisher
No, actually she completed filming on The Last Jedi, which is now in post-production. Episode 9 is still in pre-production, and filming has not yet commenced. The "archival footage" part is because her family gave Disney/Lucasfilm permission to use archival footage for her role in Episode 9 to make the script work. -A la d  insane   (Channel 2)  01:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, fine. -A la d   insane   (Channel 2)  21:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

State atheism
What do you mean it is a circular link?Apollo The Logician (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Apollo The Logician (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

science fiction
Hi. Material I added was the intro from Christian science fiction. The source I added in the next edit was the one cited in that material but with only the author's name. That is the style the other article was using.PopSci (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Please check the latest edit on Science fiction. Now I know why people don't waste their time working on it. Thanks. :-)  -PopSci (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Its true editing
Hello its me Jvngkook (talk) 07:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the anectode
Apparently, we need a source for something like this. We should look for sources for things such as date for example, what people actually say... not for something like that.

What is unnecessary usually come at the expense of what actually is critical and important. A system should never promote the appearance of method and professionalism instead of actual real quality.

Probably, you won't agree so what can I say. Keep up your work. Bye.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

I don’t think so
How can I show you the resource and that’s Chinese. QBYQ7 (talk) 08:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank You
I have removed this talk to the page of “Ping An Finance Centre”. Please read and comment it. Thank you! QBYQ7 (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
I have found 2 official websites about PAFC. I will show you at the talk page of PAFC. QBYQ7 (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Jedi
The changes I made previously had already fixed the problem - WP:SOFIXIT was a description of the changes I made. It showed up as an undo because I used undo, then changed the citation before publishing. Now, I don't have a page number, since I don't currently have access to the Bodleian (opening hours). However, the content the new user added was not on the referenced wikipedia page, and it was fairly clear to me that they were citing the book, but unfamiliar with Wikipedia. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  01:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

My content on pseudo science
my addition to pseudoscience was constructive. I added to the list Evolution is pseudoscience, it is a scientific theory that is not proven, just like creation. So just because you are biased and believe in the evolution theory does not mean you should remove my content (which is in-fact "not constructive") please get back to me --The Rightful Judge (talk) 07:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Proof is for math and whisky. Tgeorgescu (talk) 08:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Australia (continent)
In the continent infobox, I added Ashmore and Cartier Islands as a dependency within the continent of Australia, to go along with the 3 countries in the continent (Australia, Papua New Guinea, and part of Indonesia). This was to parallel the infoboxes in other continent articles. For example, Africa lists 54-56 countries and 7 dependencies; Asia lists 49-55 countries and 6 dependencies (note that Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands are considered to be within Asia); and similarly for Europe, North America, and South America. I think Ashmore and Cartier Islands are clearly within the continent of Australia. I'm not sure about the Coral Sea Islands since they are not on the continental shelf (Sahul Shelf). Goustien (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Behe
The neutrality in that article is very poor. Should this be an encyclopedia or a page for criticism of Behe's own views? Don't undo what I've done. I appreciate it. DizzinessOfFreedom (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Robynthehode. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ARobynthehode enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 12:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Pls protect Jeddah Tower from vandalism
Hi Robyn. The vandal of Jeddah Tower may have used a different ISP last April 2018, but it is the same style. Kindly protect the page. Thanks. Titus III (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

About Ping An Finance Centre
Since there is no information about the height of the Ping An Finance Centre's observation deck, I added a new source of the height of the observation deck. If you have any questions about this edit. Please leave a message on my talk page or Ping An Finance Centre's talk page. (Sorry for my bad English~) Message sent by QBYQ7 —Preceding undated comment added 11:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Youth flame
Thanks for removing Tineretului statue (Youth Flame) from the List of tallest statues article. I opened a section in the talk page about this, because the artist intended the statue to represent a human form, but I'm an abstract way. I don't feel strongly either way, but would you mind sharing your comments so a consensus can be reached? If you have ideas about how to specify this in the inclusion criteria, that would be appreciated too. Cheers Hadron137 (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please not List of Visionary tall Buildings and Structures Mode Editor?
Otherwise is still missing NeseDogan0403 (talk) 10:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Please not List of Visionary tall Buildings and Structures Mode Editor?
Otherwise is still missing NeseDogan0403 (talk) 10:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robin Hood (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guardian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Robin_Hood_%282018_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Robin_Hood_%282018_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Zarafara Wind Farm
Perhaps you should take more time and read the paper carefully, especially section

III. CASE STUDY: ZAFARANA WIND POWER FARM The Zafarana wind farm project is located in Egypt, approximately 190 Km Southeast of Cairo. The average annual wind speed is about 9.5 m/s. There are many projects have been constructed in different stages since 2001. The projects are named Zafarana-1 (30 MW- 50 WTs- 600 KW), Zafarana-2 (33 MW- 55 WTs- 600 KW), Zafarana-3 (30 MW- 46 WTs- 660 KW), Zafarana-4 (47 MW- 71 WTs- 660 KW), Zafarana-5 (85 MW- 100 WTs- 850 KW) and Zafarana-6 (80 MW- 94WTs- 850 KW) as shown in Fig. 4. In 2010, the wind farm total installed capacity was 545 MW, which includes 700 wind turbines from different models (Nordex, Vestas, and Gamesa) [11] [17-18]. The Zafarana-1 project has been considered as a case study in this work.

from: (PDF) Modeling and Simulation of ICT Network Architecture for Cyber-Physical Wind Energy System. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284167246_Modeling_and_Simulation_of_ICT_Network_Architecture_for_Cyber-Physical_Wind_Energy_System [accessed Dec 16 2018].

Meanwhile, while I am preparing the full article on that wind farm here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Michael_Cieslik/Zafarana_wind_farm, can you now please undo the delete of my changes on wind farms? Thanks! Michael Cieslik (talk) 20:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:08, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

London 50 miles 'from' an estuary
WHat are you on about. If you read Thames Estuary you will read it does not start 50 miles below or east of London. You really do not to be fact-checked. Regards. - Adam37 Talk  10:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

List of jugglers
Hi Robynthehode, thanks for the clarification, though i feel that the sentence needs clarification as to exactly what is meant. At first read it is confusing. How about something along the lines of; "holds numerous juggling world records related to number of items juggled, considered by many to be the world's greatest juggler. --? Both the Gatto & Lucas description sentences, to me, seem to require explanatory extension. Neils51 (talk) 10:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Tradewinds Square
I've proposed the article for deletion. As you are a significant contributor to the article, I'm bringing it to your attention. Cesde v a (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring
Stop your edit warring on Statue of Unity. Makes no sense that you are ignoring Criticism by writing a "controversy" section after moving much content from the article itself. 39.49.103.192 (talk) 21:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Added Unsourced Content
Hello Robynthehode,

I think you erred in sending me this message about my edit to the musical theatre page; all I did was add a space between two musical titles, thereby fixing a typo. I'm not sure where a source would be needed. Thank you, Packer1028 (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Iconic Tower
Hello Robynthehode, Iconic Tower is not visionary skyscraper, it's already under construction as of April 2019 and will be completely finished in late 2021. It was approved by the prime minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina and Dhaka City Corporation on 2017. Then how is it still visionary? 

''—Duskbean (talk, 13:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Persistent Vandalism
Hi, I've noticed you reverted my accurate edit at The Terminator. If you have a doubt regarding why action should be listed, you should first check the credibility of the sources attached. I'm not trying to force an opinion, but facts are facts that it's an action film first and action covers most of the duration of the film. There is no point in taking it to the talk page because the editor who started this has everything set up along with his friends who always side with what he says. Another user like me had a debate over the right genre but they simply shut him up.

And also,

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (125.99.216.90 (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC))

Regarding your having reverted my edit
You just reverted an edit I made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Pill.

It's very seldom that I edit Wikipedia. Years ago I read the "5 Pillars of Wikipedia" article, but other than that I'm unfamiliar with how governance works on Wikipedia. So I need to ask a preliminary question first, before I ask my main questions.

Preliminary question: I don't know what roles Wikipedia provides for those who read and or edit articles. So, I don't know if you have some formal role regarding editing Wikipedia, or if you're simply another user like I am. Do you have some official role?

Main questions: When you reverted my edit, you added the comment, "Rotten Tomato audience ratings are not reliable. This is accepted across Wikipedia".

1. Is this an official Wikipedia rule? If so, is there an article like the "5 Pillars" article that specifies that Rotten Tomatoes Audience Scores are not permitted? And where can I find it?

2. What is the evidence to support your claim that "Rotten Tomato audience ratings are not reliable"?

3. When you say, "This is accepted across Wikipedia", it makes it sound like it's a convention rather than a formal rule. Is it? And again, what's your evidence that to support the claim?


 * Thanks for your comments and queries and for not immediately reverting my edit or yours (you'd be surprised how many editors do that). I will answer your queries in turn. However please be aware that the best place for these discussions is on the article talk page so all editors can see them.

1. There are no 'rules' in Wikipedia. All 'guidelines' are created by consensus. Having said that consensus decisions do become firm guidelines that (until successfully challenged by consensus) editors are expected to abide by. So the place to see the rule about Rotten Tomatoes audience scores is WP:UGC 2. The evidence is that the reviews are user generated. Any user generated content on a website is inherently unreliable (although it may accord with reliable sources WP:RS). Other user generated content not allowed is IMDB, personal blogs, almost all 'wikis' and even Wikipedia itself 3. I think I have explained this above

I have no formal role in editing Wikipedia. In fact no editor is above any other editor in deciding what content is included in Wikipedia. Decisions are made by consensus with editors following the 'rules'. There are administrators and others who act as mediators but no content editor makes final decisions. Please read this links they may be helpful WP:5P, WP:V, WP:BRD, and WP:HEP

Hope this helps Robynthehode (talk) 08:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

/* Meters */
As you said before. i found some enough evidence for heights enough evidence for PNB 118 But why you dissagre ?. also same for Exchange 106. Why Sir.115.134.36.76 (talk) 07:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Obviousness
In English-speaking countries, North and South America are considered separate continents.

That is what I put on an article. It is not something obvious, the English Wikipedia is the most read Wikipedia worldwide. It is not only read by people from English speaking countries. So this produces ambiguity for those people, which they are rarely aware. So, it is not something obvious. LyonnaisLozannais (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

About Contortion
The editor who added the content is a sock who has been promoting this person for many years. The reason for reversion is Blocking_policy. This contortionist has been spammed for many years (see Sockpuppet investigations/VRAJESH SHAH) and is not notable. They won't be getting a page soon, as the title has been salted indef for around 2 years. Therefore, they shouldn't really be in "List of notable contortionists". Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 19:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)