User talk:Roca604

Please do not add content about "new" theories of the Tunguska event to that article. The theories that are already present there have been proposed, reviewed, and discussed by many scientists that have published their views in multiple reliable sources. Even the speculative hypotheses are at least notable by having received substantial media coverage. But a new finding that has never been published by a reliable source, which this new one is, is insignificant and should not be presented on the article. That is, Wikipedia is not a venue for vetting newly proposed theories. Only when a theory has been relaibly published and achieved a degree of recognition (good or bad) does it belong on Wikipedia. If you disagree, please take your concerns to Talk:Tunguska event. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)