User talk:Rocalisi

I regard myself a fair self critic Arab.

Edit war
The activities by the three user (names: Nableezy, Soman, Malik_Shabazz), that are continuously engaged in the edits war on the page Pan Arabism.

Nableezy
Have you ever used a prior account on Wikipedia?  nableezy  - 04:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC) I haven't whay do you ask me that question? Rocalisi (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Makes the next step easier. Bye.  nableezy  - 04:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

What? Rocalisi (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Nableez's suspicious obsessed accusations of supposed sock puppets
To Nableezy! As soon as I came to wikipedia you were the first to contact me and not in a welcoming manner but to ask me weird question did I have another account, I asked you why do you ask, you said: "it makes the next step easier", what the heck that means. Or, for instance, I wasn't very much of a fan of edits by LeeSeem, but I am against censorship, if it's covered via a supposed legitimate claim or other. The very fact that you tried to lump me with other people is in itself raising suspicion that you are only blocking-others-goal driven, not out of fact based, sincerity. Maybe somone can check your records, how many people you have tried to blame this on? (Nableezy's removal of my message) More on Re: Nableezy's trick blaming of sock puppetry on pan-Arabism page

---

I quote here what a user by the name Yasmina (Miss-simworld) wrote on extremists Arabists' way of doing/dictating things lol the same happens to me with the other Radical Pan-Arabists editors they often like to intimidate others to put them off editing and try to undermine sources and their context. one of them even abusively vandalised a page where stated that many Christians dont relate with Arabism saying they were racists and it was lies from a bigotted minority (yes they got away with writing that until I stepped in and deleted it from the page), then the same person had a nerve to threaten to get me blocked for my disruptive editing. like I said sadly wikipedia is crawling with those wanting to supress or distort information rather than write from an accuarate or impartial perspective looking at the other side rather than the black and white. When they dont get their way they are willing to go to great lengths to vandalize or stop you from editing one of them even tried to (falsely) accuse me and Lanternix of being socks to get us banned. Like I said this is sadly the actions of a brainwashed blinded bunch of followers of a dead & racist ideology.♥Yasmina♥ (talk) 17:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)  Rocalisi (talk) 04:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Soman
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kamel Riahi, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Kamel Riahi appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kamel Riahi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Soman (talk) 02:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Rocalisi (talk) 04:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Malik Shabazz
 Rocalisi (talk) 03:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
__NOINDEX__  E lockid  ( Talk ) 20:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

====

I am blocked for decrying racism by pan Arabism

Needless to say that there was no base for blocking me, other than persistant nagging by (Palestinian) nableezy who only has a campaign to push his POV down throats of all.

I have no clue who these people are, he tried to lump me with, including more names I saw in your recent contributions, my bad.

His "evidences" because I insisted to be right on talk of pan-Arabism is senseless, it was he, who was persistant from my coming here to wikipedia with his "welcoming" message of "did you have a prior account?" which only invited me even more into the issue of pan Arabism's bloody history and present.

These two factors have led me to be more active on pan arabism, your posting on my user page with that strange question, and Sean.hoyland asking me to respond on the discussion of pan Arabism. How then, does my argument there constitute "proof" that I sock?

Well, nableezy, I am sure the fight for truth will go on, I am confident that third eyes see what's going on, they're not stupid. The "evidence" of me supporting opinions of those that were blocked by you are not only ridiculuos to base blocking-actions on, but it may just prove that your push to block all those people wern't justified to begin with, I hope that all those that see your terrorizing behaviour will realize that I made a mistake by agreeing with you on a few links to be removed from the pan-Arabism, I shlould have been more aggressive, this is a leson to be learned not to be soft on propagandists racists like you, as long as we have such Arabs that can't be self critic, nothing is going to change in our world, and the victims of oppressive pan-Arabism: Copts, Assyrians, Shia Arabs, Iranians, Kurds, Berbers, Jews, Africans, and all others that are not "in line" will suffer, conflicts will rise again and again, wars and bloodshed won't stop.

It might be just so typical of a militant Palestinian that draws Arabs to such despicable trends, beliefs, self destructiveness.

By his extremism he vilifies the Palestibe cause as well, making it look like part of his racism personality. Now you can delete this, coward! Rocalisi (talk) 07:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)