User talk:Roche.n/sandbox

What does the article (or section) do well? I think that the contributions that you made to an already existing article effectively improved it. The information you added was relevant and not at all biased. You spent a perfect amount of time discussing each section.

What changes would you suggest overall? The only minor correction that you may want to make is making sure that the citations are listed in numerical order, for the most part. The order of the citations right now are pretty arbitrary.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Maybe do not keep everything the same for as many sections as you listed. Even if it's just a minor correction, there may be room for improvement in the original article.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I am also making additions to an already existing article, so I found it helpful seeing how you made improvements.

Peer Review: What does the article (or section) do well? I noticed you updated a lot of the facts and figures to reflect more current trends, which I thought was necessary in the edits. You also cut out redundancies well i.e. the energy sources section. I also liked that you updated the nuclear power section to be more effective and rounded out.

What changes would you suggest overall? I might suggest addition of a section on moving forward or what is being done in the future of Japanese energy as well as this year if there is any more updated information available.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? I would see if there was anything else you could add to the sections you chose not to change and update those ones as well if at all possible.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I am also editing an existing article and I want to take your lead and try to add more sections to make it more organized and easy to read.You also utilized quite a few sources, I used fewer longer sources for mine and I may add in more information from the two I held off from using thus far. Knapolitano60 (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)