User talk:RockNRollStaaaa

Reference Errors on 29 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Nimrod (album) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=601747162 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F601747162%7CNimrod (album)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Megadeth certifications
Hello. I noticed that you have changed the certifications on Risk and Cryptic Writings. As you can see, their certifications (platinum & gold) are supported by Billboard and RIAA, so without relevant discussion, your edits can not be approved. I appreciate your willingness to help, but please provide reliable sources next time you want to contribute. Bye for now.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't know if you'll see this or not because I don't know how this works, but Risk has not been certified Gold and Cryptic Writings has not been certified Platinum, according to the RIAA. I don't know how to work citations very well. I just tried to fix Risk, but my citations didn't work and it won't let me.--RockNRollStaaaa


 * See the reports by Billboard and CMJ News? They published that the albums were certified platinum & gold. There is always the talk page for discussing things like this.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

RIAA says Risk has not been certified and Cryptic Writings was certified Gold. If the people who certify albums say Cryptic Writings was only certified Gold, then I believe it was only certified Gold.--RockNRollStaaaa

May 2014
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 20:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to megadeth. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

I did have a source. You were the one without one. And just because a majority of people say it's certified platinum doesn't mean it's true. If the RIAA said it, then it's true. If the RIAA didn't say it, then it's false. And according to the RIAA, the organization that certifies albums, Cryptic Writings has not gone platinum and Risk has not gone gold. Check riaa.com for proof. --RockNRollStaaaa

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Megadeth, you may be blocked from editing. --Вик Ретлхед (talk) 05:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

You told me to add sources if I want to edit. I thought that was what I did. And why are you using the same source (riaa.com) for every other certification except Cryptic Writings and Risk? I don't think it makes sense. RIAA is the one who certifies albums, and if they say Cryptic Writings only went gold and Risk hasn't been certified, then you're wrong. It's not that complicated. I've been proving you wrong for a while now, and you aren't even trying to prove me wrong.--RockNRollStaaaa


 * It appears to be a conflict of sources. If you want to change the content in your favour, please initiate a discussion at the talk page. A stubborn edit warring won't do you any favour.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ...And Justice for All (album). Mlpearc ( open channel ) 16:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I added a certification with proof. The BPI says it went gold. The BPI is the one who certifies albums in the UK. My source was their website. How is that vandalism? --RockNRollStaaaa
 * There is no reference within the edit I reverted.  Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 16:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)