User talk:Rockefeller2015

May 2018
Your addition to Jim Durkin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.  Hut 8.5  20:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Durkin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CataracticPlanets (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Durkin, you may be blocked from editing. CataracticPlanets (talk) 00:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Thank you for bringing your concerns about the sourcing of Jim Durkin to the biographies of living people noticeboard. You raise a valid point: the newspapers cited are not neutral, reliable sources. I have removed the section in question based on this violation of WP:RS and left a note on the talk page both explaining my reasoning and inviting editors to find citations from the Tribune or other reliable sources before re-adding the material.


 * The noticeboard was the correct venue for you to raise your concerns, as it framed the situation properly per our policies, and it was not a direct edit to the article. Please be advised that, since you have declared yourself to be connected to Durkin, you are strongly suggested to refrain from editing the article. You are welcome to request edits at the article's talk page, of course, and to participate in discussions there.


 * There is one other procedural matter: if you are a paid spokesman of Durkin, or if you are paid/compensated by anybody for your edits on Wikipedia, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation to declare your status as a paid editor. WP:PAID has more information on the policy and required declaration. —C.Fred (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Also
Please also be aware of Wikipedia policy WP:LEGALTHREAT. MPS1992 (talk) 22:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)