User talk:Rocker36

June 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of My Babysitter's a Vampire episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''All info about the future of a TV series requires references. This includes new seasons and renewals.'' Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Sam & Cat episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Dog With a Blog episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Using bogus reference for info added Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Good Luck Charlie episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. info added with fake reference Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Sam & Cat episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Info added using bogus reference - again Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Gravity Falls episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Don't speculate about when something will happen in future Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jessie episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Using fake references is worse than just adding non-referenced info to article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Austin & Ally episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Need references for production codes Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello Rocker36, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to I Didn't Do It (TV series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to I Didn't Do It (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from I Didn't Do It (TV series) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Unjustified and unnecessary split. See WP:SPLIT and propose one on the talk page and get consensus. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I tagged the article with proposed split and started a split discussion on your behalf at Talk:I Didn't Do It (TV series). Please join discussion there and explain why you think it is useful to the project to split the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Your addition to Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Your addition to I Didn't Do It (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Again - warned at least twice before not to do this Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at List of Liv and Maddie episodes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 20:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Your addition to K.C. Undercover has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You've been blocked for this before, you know this not permitted and still persist Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Your addition to Best Friends Whenever has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Logical Fuzz (talk) 16:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for this. I've been trying to figure out why there wasn't a separating line between 19 and 20 under the Viewers column. Amaury (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

List of Girl Meets World episodes - Girl Meets Conflict Resolution
Your title change to Girl Meets Rileytown made it conflict with the source, which shows it is indeed Girl Meets Conflict Resolution, so I changed that back. However, if there's another (reliable) source out there supporting your title, then do feel more than free to add it as an alternate title below the current titles, using AltTitle and RAltTitle. Cheers! Amaury (talk) 21:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your edits at List of Austin & Ally episodes and List of Liv and Maddie episodes
I needed to revert them  because the source you cited, from http://www.tvmediainsights.com, points to forum posts which are generally not reliable. Also, when I looked thru the posts, I saw Son of the Bronx, whose material is unclear on reliability (WP:TVFAQ indicates no consensus has been reached on the reliability of that source). And concerning the edit at List of Liv and Maddie episodes, where you filled in ratings for another episode which cites The Futon Critic: if you look closely at that source, Liv and Maddie has an asterisk marked by it, and the note by the asterisk says that individual numbers for the show were not available, and they were using the primetime average for the network's (in this case Disney Channel's) viewership instead. Viewership data must reflect the individual show's performance on its first run, not the network's average. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Laura Marano At 2015 MTV VMA's.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Laura Marano At 2015 MTV VMA's.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from K.C. Undercover with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from K.C. Undercover into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. (It has been fixed already.) nyuszika7h (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)