User talk:Rockerdc

License tagging for Image:Tristan and Isolde.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tristan and Isolde.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Kuru talk  03:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages — it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. Kuru talk  04:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Reply: You are vandalizing my article. Just delete the article if it is not satifactory for you. Leaving these large authoritarian notes and subjective assertions about what is wrong with the article is useless and damaging. I have repeatedly tried to work with Wikipedia on this article by editing your criticisms, and have gotten nowhere. You have denied the source materials and acomplishments for the artist and have acted with the bias of high school technocrats. My article has been called "appalling". I've been called a "publicist" and even the artist himself! All without any proof whatsoever. I've seen biographical articles written on historical figures in Wikipedia that could have been written by a 7th grader, and they are allowed. When I state the artist's print publications to prove he is an active illustrator in his field, you deny their existence by claiming they cannot be found on the Internet. You've claimed that the article has been cut and pasted from another source on the Internet, when in fact, it has not. Who are you people?