User talk:Rocket88BW

Draft:Arthur Migliazza concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arthur Migliazza, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur Migliazza


Hello, Rocket88BW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur Migliazza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Arthur Migliazza
Hello, Rocket88BW,

Thank you for creating Arthur Migliazza.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Many of the sources are interviews, or profiles of the subject in local papers in the context of an upcoming performance, and as such it is unclear if they are sufficiently independent of the subject to be reliable. Similarly, Amazon and the subject's personal websites are not suitable sources for anything other than the most trivial claims, and even then are still inferior to coverage in an independent, reliable source."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 22:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)