User talk:Rocketdesign

Welcome!

Hello, Rocketdesign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type   on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 08:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
OK, you have a bone to pick with this journal, I get it. But you cannot put that kind of stuff in the article unless you have reliable sources backing up your assertions. Putting in an article on a journal when the last article was published is indeed sourceable to the journal's own website, but it still isn't information that we include in journal articles because 1/ it is not encyclopedic, 2/ any conclusions that can be drawn from that are inherently original research (something we should refrain from), and 3/ if we'd do this for all academic journals for which we have articles, somebody would have a full time job keeping all those articles updated. So, please stop adding unsourced stuff to this article and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. I will consider continued efforts to insert this stuff in the article as vandalism. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)