User talk:Rockfit23

Jim keffer
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jim keffer, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://jimkeffer.com/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Charles G. Hall
Recently you created a biography article for Charles G. Hall. This article only cites one reference, an obituary. Obituaries fail WP:Notability and are not sufficient to establish a need for a person to warrant an encyclopedic article. This article is likely to get deleted if no other citations are provided. I will work to prevent this for now, but you need to find more references. Make sure to read Identifying reliable sources, and Notability (people). Just respond here if you need any help from me. Cheers and happy editing Dkriegls (talk) 23:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles G. Hall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles G. Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charles G. Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)