User talk:Rocksanddirt/Archives/2009/January

Perplexity and Bafflement
My objective is enlightenment (not bafflement). Nonetheless, there are many confusing and perplexing mysteries that scientists, scholars, researchers, and academics spend their lives studying. It can take as long as a generation or two for new insights to find their way into public awareness, especially when new scientific findings must displace long-entrenched cultural myths and misconceptions. I invite you to open a friendly (and scholarly) dialogue to explore and unpack the ideas that you find baffling. I assure you that this is bona fide material, dating back a century to Henri Poincaré. I admit that some of this material is intellectually challenging to understand at a technical level. But you don't need to dive down to the technical depths to appreciate the results subsumed under Chaos Theory, Game Theory, and Drama Theory. —Barry Kort 13:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Help
When I opened up Wikipedia, without signing in, I had a new message from you about vandalism, yet the IP address wasn't mine. Any ideas? Orthorhombic (talk) 09:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, yes, I should have taken a note of the IP address at the time. Orthorhombic (talk) 10:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC) I used the Philidelphia Orchestra webpage. It has the awards she's won and some other things. Awesometubagirl (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Awesometubagirl

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nigel Harrison has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/thegrabs).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Please reply
I would really like to know what third-party independent sources you know of that establish David Talbott's noatability. Please advise on the appropriate AfD page. ScienceApologist (talk) 18:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)