User talk:Rocky70091/View of Haarlem with Bleaching Fields

peer review
I love your other version on "View of Haarlem with Bleaching Fields". I thought it was a good idea to put many version of it to show different perspective. There were good citation and reference about the "View of Haarlem with Bleaching Fields". The writing is generally clear and well-structured, but here are a few minor suggestions for improvement in Significance is in the first sentence, consider rephrasing "the sudden rise in pleasant countryside landscape paintings" to "the sudden rise in the popularity of pleasant countryside landscape paintings," to clarify that it's the popularity of this subject matter that increased but it's totally up to you to change it. then in the second sentence, you might consider adding the year or century when the iconoclasm took place to provide more historical context for readers. In Symbolism in the second sentence, consider breaking up the long sentence into two shorter ones to make the ideas easier to follow. The third sentence, consider replacing "Thusly" with "Therefore" to improve clarity. The last sentence, consider adding a citation or attribution to support the claim that this is a "popular symbolic interpretation" of the work. Overall, I think you did a good job on your "View of Haarlem with Bleaching Fields". Looking at the picture of the View of Haarlem with Bleaching Fields it look so beautiful and I can't wait to see what your finish touch on View of Haarlem with Bleaching Fields when it is publish for people to see. Amandatuyen (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)