User talk:RockySurfaces/Oak Ridges Moraine/User5843 Peer Review

Peer Review Feedback
Hi,

Thanks for providing feedback and peer reviewing my additions to the Oak Ridges Moraine article. I agree that the lead would need to see some changes to better summarize all the sections including the new section about geology. I had not thought to update the lead to incorporate a new section nor that it would require concise information about the topic sections, which it evidently does not have.

Further explaining geological concepts would be beneficial, as you suggest, to get this information to broader audience. Basic geology was my goal with this draft process, but you have underlined an important aspect, being inclusion of a description of which unconformity type is present and approximate timeline that it represents. With regards to more recent information, I will try to look for scientific publications and other reputable sources that have updated knowledge about the Oak Ridges Moraine.

It is unfortunate that one source was unable to be located, yes a link to it should have been included in the draft reference section. As you suggested a different source to examine, I will take a look at it and add relevant information into the draft.

From the organization feedback, your proposed sentence will be added into the first sentence of the draft article for an easier reading experience. Additional content would most definitely be separated into subsections once I find some information that can be incorporated while staying relevant to the section topic.

RockySurfaces (talk) 17:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)