User talk:Roddna

RE: Monte Montgomery
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

> Best O Fortuna (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

> Best O Fortuna (talk) 04:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

> Best O Fortuna (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. You've been making the same revert at Monte Montgomery over and over, you don't participate in discussions and you never explain the reason for your revert. If you are willing to explain yourself, please use the unblock template (as explained above) and another admin may be willing to unblock you. EdJohnston (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)