User talk:Rodenatorpro

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    21:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rodenator


A tag has been placed on Rodenator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mo ainm ~Talk  17:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion and obvious abuse of multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Ambox question.svg|40px]]Regarding your email to me: I'm sorry you can't understand how language like "the most effective tool for eliminating burrowing pests on the market today" or "Unlike other companies which have attempted to imitate our products" could be seen as promotional. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written from a neutral point of view, which that most certainly is not. This is why we discourage anyone from editing in an area where they have an inherent conflict of interest, which you were warned about whern your first account was blocked for spamming. It also looks an awful lot like you just copied over material from the corporate website, which would be a copyright violation on top of being obviously promotional. On top of all that your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, when you create an account a notice advises you not to use a name that represent an organization or product, and you were already blocked as User:Rodenator a little over a week ago and you decided that instead of trying to comprehend what was wrong that time you would do the exact same thing again. So, I'm puzzled as to why you would email me asking why when you already had every reason to believe this would happen just as it did the first time. I have no intention of reversing this block, but you are welcome to appeal to another administrator by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. And you will absolutely have to change that username. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)