User talk:Rodik

Your recent edits
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Satori Son 12:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks for the guidlines
I`ve checked them before adding these links and IMHO they comply the following statements

for fstructures.com "because the content of that external link is too long and would not be possible to summarize it in the article, but it is is a reliable source" Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews because it`s blog style community where users contribute their information and news regarding this market.

for vingida.com Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.

Thus there are company copyrighted materials- their website contains lot`s of technical info regarding tensile structures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodik (talk • contribs) 13:19, April 24, 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the time to read the guideline, but I have looked at fstructures.com and it is absolutely not a reliable source, so the inclusion criterion you have referenced above does not apply.
 * Please also read the section on "Links normally to be avoided", which prohibit both "Links to blogs." and "Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services." Unfortunately, these websites are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Thanks, Satori Son 14:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Rodik 15:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC) thanks for the explanation, I`ll be more accurate in future!