User talk:Rodney1956

It seems that science is discovering the fabulous things the "Star Trek" programs showed us, and is turning science fiction into science fact. Below is a brief summary of possible, even likely, further steps in this process. Of course, it will be some years before science and technology can regard these ideas of instant space-time travel, cosmic unification, eternal health and unification of humans with God as more than science fiction or fantasy.

1) In July 2009, electrical engineer Hong Tang and his team at Yale University in the USA demonstrated that, on silicon chip- and transistor- scales, light can attract and repel itself like electric charges/magnets (Discover magazine’s "Top 100 Stories of 2009 #83: Like Magnets, Light Can Attract and Repel Itself" by Stephen Ornes, from the January-February 2010 special issue; published online December 21, 2009). This is the “optical force”, a phenomenon that theorists first predicted in 2005 (this time delay is rather confusing since James Clerk Maxwell showed that light is an electromagnetic disturbance approx. 140 years ago). In the event of the universe having an underlying electronic foundation (a necessary precursor to scientific fulfilment of Star Trek's "magic" which becomes clear as these steps are read), it would be composed of "silicon chip- and transistor- scales” and the Optical Force would not be restricted to microscopic scales but could operate universally. Tang proposes that the optical force could be exploited in telecommunications. For example, switches based on the optical force could be used to speed up the routing of light signals in fibre-optic cables, and optical oscillators could improve cell phone signal processing.

2) If all forms of EM (electromagnetic) radiation can attract/repel, radio waves will also cause communication revolution e.g. with the Internet and mobile (cell) phones. There may be no more overexposure to ultraviolet or X-rays.

Rodney1956 (talk) 04:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

3) In agreement with the wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics, EM waves have particle-like properties (more noticeable at high frequencies) so cosmic rays (actually particles) are sometimes listed on the EM spectrum beyond its highest frequency of gamma rays.

4) If cosmic rays are made to repel, astronauts going to Mars or another star or galaxy would be safe from potentially deadly radiation.

5) And if all particles in the body can be made to attract or repel as necessary, doctors will have new ways of restoring patients to health.

6) From 1929 til his death in 1955, Einstein worked on his Unified Field Theory with the aim of uniting electromagnetism and gravitation. Future achievement of this means warps of space (gravity, according to General Relativity) between spaceships/stars could be attracted together, thereby eliminating distance. And "warp drive" would not only come to life in future science/technology ... it would be improved tremendously, almost beyond imagination.

7) Since Relativity says space and time can never exist separately, warps in space are actually warps in space-time. Eliminating distances in space also means “distances” between both future and past times are eliminated - and time travel becomes reality. This is foreseen by the Enterprise time-travelling back to 20th-century Earth in the 1986 movie "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" and by Star Trek's "subspace communications". Doing away with distances in space and time also opens the door to Star Trek-like teleportation (and the phrase "Beam me up, Scotty" could be used in real-life situations). Teleportation wouldn’t involve reproducing the original and there would be no need to destroy the original body – we would “simply” be here one moment, and there the next (wherever and whenever our destination is).

8) Another step might be to think of "... the grand design of the universe, a single theory that explains everything" (words used by Stephen Hawking on the American version of Amazon, when promoting his latest book “The Grand Design”) in a different way than physicists who are presently working on science's holy grail of unification. Recalling the manmade Genesis Planet in the 1982 movie "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan", we might anticipate that the future will actually see a manmade planet (literally forming a planet is merely an advancement of terraforming, where a planet is engineered to be Earth-like and habitable). We might even free our minds from all restrictions and imagine science and technology creating every planet in the universe. The universe’s underlying electronic foundation (which makes our cosmos into a partially-complete unification, similar to 2 objects which appear billions of years or billions of light-years apart on a huge computer screen actually being unified by the strings of ones and zeros making up the computer code which is all in one small place) would make our cosmos into a complete unification if it enabled not only elimination of all distances in space and time, but also elimination of distance between (and including) the different sides of objects and particles. This last point requires the universe to not merely be a vast collection of the countless photons, electrons and other quantum particles within it; but to be a unified whole that has “particles” and “waves” built into its union of digital 1’s and 0’s (or its union of qubits – quantum binary digits). If we use the example of CGH (computer generated holography), these "particles" and "waves" would either be elements in a Touchable Hologram - demonstrated by Japanese researchers in August 2009 (search for "Touchable Holography" in Google or You Tube) - or elements produced by the interaction of electromagnetic and presently undiscovered gravitational waves, producing what we know as mass (in September 2008, renowned British astrophysicist Professor Stephen Hawking bet US$100 that the Large Hadron Collider would not find the Higgs boson, a theoretical particle supposed to explain how other particles acquire mass) and forming what we know as space-time. Einstein predicted the existence of gravitational waves, and measurements on the Hulse-Taylor binary-star system resulted in Russell Hulse and Joe Taylor being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1993 for their work, which was the first indirect evidence for gravitational waves. The feedback of the past and future universes into the unified cosmos's electronic foundation would ensure that both past and future could not be altered. (A unified whole that has particles and waves built into its union disagrees with Einstein's view of weights [mass] causing indentations in a malleable “rubber sheet” called space-time, but that system can yield exactly the same measurements as his and I think Einstein would welcome the chance to consider a different interpretation.) (Our brains and minds are part of this unification too, which must mean extrasensory perception and telekinetic independence from technology are possible.)

9) Elimination of diseased matter and/or eliminating the distance in time between a patient and recovery from any adverse medical condition – even death - would also be a valuable way of restoring health. With literal time travel, people who have long since died could have their minds downloaded into reproductions of their bodies - a modification of ideas published by robotics/artificial-intelligence pioneer Hans Moravec, inventor/futurist Ray Kurzweil and others - allowing them to “recover” from death (establishing colonies throughout space and time would prevent overpopulation). Or if the distance between recovery and a patient is reduced to zero before illness or accident occurs (we might call this “eVaccination” – electronic vaccination); prevention of any adverse medical condition, including that of a second death for those resurrected, can occur. Science's real-life conquering of all disease, and even death, would certainly make the technology employed by Leonard "Bones" McCoy, the Enterprise's doctor, appear non-futuristic.

10) These paragraphs imply the possibility of humans time-travelling to the distant past and using electronics to create this particular subuniverse's computer-generated Big Bang (but there's still room for God because God would be a pantheistic union of the megauniverse's material and mental parts, forming a union with humans in a cosmic unification). We've seen several examples of how science fact could equal, or surpass, science fiction. A final example of surpassing is that, in Star Trek, there are many military conflicts with Klingons, Romulans, the Borg, etc. In a real-life cosmic unification, there are no wars between the stars but peace is normal - even on Earth - since nobody can attack anyone in any way without knowing they're attacking themself.

Rodney1956 (talk) 05:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * }

Ronald Mallett
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Please do not use Wikipedia links as references. Remember, anybody can edit Wikipedia, that is why Wikipedia must be verifiable: reliably sourced and cited. You could copy an appropriate reference from the Wiki page you are using.

Instead of linking to Wikipeida pages with "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Tegmark", use Max Tegmark This helps for internal bookkeeping, fixing links when pages are renamed, and other things. See wp:links

You migth want to put your above text on your user page: User:Rodney1956 per wp:user pages Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Rodney1956. Jim is correct in his observation that Wikipedia cannot be used as a supporting source for content added to the encyclopedia.  You may consider Wikipedia personally reliable, but for content to be added there must be independent, secondary sources (see Identifying reliable sources).  Additionally, your edit contains original research; "the subjects of interstellar [17] - and even intergalactic [18] - travel appear to be unifying with time travel" is drawing a conclusion.  The sources either state unambiguously that the principles are approaching unity or they do not.  Similarly, the last sentence of your content offers another conclusion.  We, as editors, do not offer conclusions based on facts.  Our job is to report the facts and let the reader reach their own conclusions.  I did not read the sources you cited because as an administrator it's not my place to judge content (the sources may very well state the conclusions that you draw); my concern is that content brought to the article's mainspace complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  I would strongly advise that you remove the content and rewrite it so that it follows Wikipedia guidelines.  If it would help, I could direct you to editors with experience that would be able to help you construct your edit.  I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions.  Regards  Tide  rolls  04:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)