User talk:Rodney M Bennett

Your work
I hope that you will accept some suggestions from someone who has been around a bit longer. First, in Wikipedia, you don't "own" an article so it is not good etiquette to sign your contributions and articles. You may have originated it but anyone else can change it. You must also be prepared to accept other people's edits. I have been trying to clean up your article to make it acceptable for Wikipedia and to ensure that it isn't seen as a "vanity" article just puffing up an obscure and "non-notable" person. If it isn't cleaned up then someone may come along and demand that it be removed which would be a pity.

It is good etiquette to sign any comments on Talk pages. Hopethis helps. Dabbler 13:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Sophsta.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sophsta.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Sphsta.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Sphsta.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not sign Wikipedia articles
In Wikipedia all articles are, in theory, the joint work of all contributors. They should not be signed by putting the four ~ as this may be seen as you claiming other people's workl as your own. Dabbler 01:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Catty family
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Catty family, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. • Gene93k (talk) 12:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mary Rundle CBE
A tag has been placed on Mary Rundle CBE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 16:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mary Rundle (British naval officer)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mary Rundle (British naval officer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Mary Rundle (British naval officer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Mary Rundle
Hi, I have managed to rescue this article by providing valid WP:reliable sources. If you have further information which could be used to expand the article AND which can be backed up by RS, eg local press, service magazines, etc please let me know via my talk page as I would be interested in making the article better. If it is possible to source a photgraph with permission from the original photographer for reuse then that would be good, too. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)