User talk:Rodrigo.Suarez, Sr

November 2014
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Ethiopian Airlines Flight 409 does not have an edit summary.Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer $Talk$ 10:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kai Tak Airport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Air Serbia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 15:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to TUIfly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SideshowBob7 (talk) 11:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Air Canada. SideshowBob7 (talk) 17:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Nikolas.Sudarpo. Thank you. SideshowBob7 (talk) 11:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. HkCaGu (talk) 19:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Harper/Editnotice


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Stephen Harper/Editnotice, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  KJ  Discuss? 09:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm SideshowBob7. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Air Berlin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SideshowBob7 (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)