User talk:Rodrunner17

My Talk
Is it reliable and notable if i use reference from this web http://zeroboards.net/ in review? Rodrunner17 (talk) 02:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * No, it's not, because that is a blog site and anyone could say anything on it. Therefore it is not a reliable source. Sorry.  Chzz  ►  02:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

--- (The following section was removed with this edit; I've reinstated it  Chzz  ►  04:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC))

what do u think about http://gamelist.bbgsite.com/goto/conra.shtml ? Just found it frm google


 * As above. Not an RS.  Chzz  ►  04:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

---

what do u think about http://www.techcrunch.com/ ?


 * Please don't remove comments from an ongoing helpme; it will be easier for other helpers to see what has happened before.


 * Please sign your messages with ~


 * Please give a link to the reference that you think is appropriate, rather than the homepage of a website. (But, looking at that page, I doubt it is a reliable source; have you actually read WP:RS ?


 * Thanks,  Chzz  ►  04:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

If you doubt, you should delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ERepublik


 * Please sign your messages with ~ :-)


 * Regarding ERepublik, please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. I'll check that article now, and see if it needs deleting. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  04:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Having checked, there are plenty of reliable sources for ERepublik for example google news. The present article may need work, but it's certainly a notable product.  Chzz  ►  04:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Tips on referencing
There are lots of ways to do this, some are simple, some more complex.

Personally, I like using citation templates, and fill in as much as I possibly can; maybe a bit more work, but I think it looks better. You have a. An example usage is;

For all the possible things to include, see Template:Citation

Of course, you don't have to put everything in, just whatever you can. The above example is a book, but I've included a 'convenience link' to a website that displays it.

Then, at the end of the document (but before any 'category' tags), you need a references section. You just put,

Another help request
What if i want to cite at book with ISBN 978-979-27-0567-6 (written in indonesia lang) ?

i use your http://tools.wikimedia.pl/~holek/isbn.php but it seems didnt work


 * Hi again.


 * Please start new conversations (like this) in a new section at the end of the page, and also please remember to 'sing' your messages with ~.


 * I'll have a look at that book thing now...and reply here in a few minutes.  Chzz  ►  05:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * So - the tool isn't perfect (by a long way) - it's just a shortcut, and can be useful. You always need to check it's results. In this case, I tried to find info on the book in a few other places, including Amazon, but I was unable to do so. If you actually have the book though, and are citing it, you could just fill in the information by hand, like this;


 * Cheers,  Chzz  ►  05:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, if i use non-english book as a ref of an article, how can you verify that? do u guys understand indonesia lang?

i mean, i can just pretend that reference is in that book (which actually it doesnt exist in that book) since you dont understand the language ? Rodrunner17 (talk) 06:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It's got to be verifiable. That means I could check it, if I really wanted to. If I did want to, I'd just find a Wikipedian who could speak indonesian - either on the English Wikipedia, or on Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia.


 * Failing that, I could ask someone to translate it for me - I've got a friend over in Malaysia that I think can speak Indonesian.


 * The point is, it would be possible. No problems. With almost 10 million users, it's not too hard to find someone to help out.  Chzz  ►  06:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rodrunner17/Conra


A tag has been placed on User:Rodrunner17/Conra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)