User talk:Rodw/Archive 17

Your GA nomination of Theatre Royal, Bath
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Theatre Royal, Bath you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theatre Royal, Bath
The article Theatre Royal, Bath you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theatre Royal, Bath for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Considering going to London 15th Birthday Party?
Hi Rod. Wondered if you, or anyone you know in our area, are considering going to the WP London 15th Birthday Party on Sat 16th 19:30 to 22:30 at Newspeak House? I'm considering it, maybe driving to reduce costs, so could offer lifts if anyone else is going. Would be tempted to go earlier in the day to take in a museum first. Rwendland (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Muller records
Hi RodW, Apologies for the delay in responding to your previous message. At Bristol Record Office we mainly hold original/unpublished archives and don’t appear to have copies of the publications you mentioned. Our online catalogue (http://archives.bristol.gov.uk) lists everything BRO has available, so you could check if we hold copies of any of the other publications you're seeking using the advanced search (http://archives.bristol.gov.uk/advanced.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog).

If not, the local studies section of Bristol Reference Library may have copies of locally published material, so it could be worth contacting them (https://www.bristol.gov.uk/libraries-archives/reference-library). However, the quickest way might be to see if the items are listed on the COPAC library catalogue, to identify dates of publication (http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/).

Hope this is helpful :)

BRO MarkS (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
DBaK (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Theatre Royal, Bath
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Millar, Alan (1992) Bus & Coach Recognition : Ian Allan Ltd., ISBN 0-7110-2060-4
Hi Rod, Sorry for the delayed reply. Unfortunately, no I don't believe I have the book any more, I've had a look and can't find it. Most likely it went to a charity shop when I last moved house! Apologies, Best wishes Quackdave (talk) 12:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Bristol
There are just a few things that need to be cleared up. See User talk:Corinne. I'll make any necessary changes when I hear from you. Corinne (talk) 03:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see a problem with renominating it at TFAR, Rod. - Dank (push to talk) 20:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=704921485 your edit] to M4 motorway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 2010|url=http://www.assembly.wales/Laid%20Documents/SUB-LD8271%20-%20The%20M4%20Motorway%20 Junction%2041,%20Westbound%20Exit%20Slip%20Road,%20Sunnycroft%20Roundabout,%20Baglan,%20Neath%
 * | style="margin-left:1em; margin-bottom:1em; color:black; font-size:90%;" class="wikitable"

The name of the pub in keinton mandeville
I happen to live in keinton Mandeville and recently added places of interest to its Wikipedia page. You then updated from "pub" to "the three castles inn" I then corrected you as it is actually called the quarry inn, you then undid my correction. I happen to frequent the quary inn and have even searched google mapped its location to ensure i am not mistaken. All in all the pub on the keinton mandeville high street is called the quarry inn. I will let you verify it yourself, if you find this to be accurate please change it back too the quarry in.

Thank you Gsykes p.s if you wish too ask for more info about keinton mandeville don't hesitate to ask. --Gsykes537 (talk) 23:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

The Half Million Award!
Thanks I have added this as "Half Million Award" per Wikipedia talk:Million Award.&mdash; Rod talk 17:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Rod,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Wells Cathedral in the reflecting pool in the grounds of the Bishops Palace.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on March 19, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-03-19. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Peak District portal
Hi Rod, thanks for drawing that to my attention. I thought I'd eliminated most of them by going from the Category names, but clearly missed some. Anyway I've dabbed them or deleted them where there is no article. --Bermicourt (talk) 13:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: TFA nomination for Bristol
Hi Rod -- The lead is certainly improving but I personally wouldn't say it was there yet; it is still a little long, feels like a disconnected set of facts with a rather promotional slant and has references. I haven't had chance to read the text but spot checks don't seem to meet the featured brilliant prose standard. A few other random thoughts... The map location is hard to read unless you already know where Bristol is. The images are all over the place and some of the captions need trimming. Why are there so many see also items? Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought refs in leads were strongly discouraged as the material should wholly be summarising material that's referenced in the body? But I don't follow the fads of the ever-changing MoS. If challenges are a problem, you could always try putting refs in hidden text in the lead -- this is what the medical project often do. Espresso Addict (talk) 16:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Listed buildings in Scotland
Forgive me if this isn't your specialty - perhaps someone else watching your page might know the answer. I was up in Glasgow this weekend and took some photos of some interesting Victorian architecture...I'm sure many of these buildings are listed and was planning to upload some photos to Commons after identifying them. What I would do in England would be to get the geo-tag from the photo and find the listing using the map search function on Historic England. However, I'm looking at Scotland's designations portal and it doesn't seem to have any type of geo search. Would you know of any other resources to use? Kelly hi! 13:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Although I've done quite a few listed buildings in England & I'm familiar with Historic England systems, I've not tried in Scotland. Why not try asking at: WikiProject Scotland or Talk:Glasgow.&mdash; Rod talk 13:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Kelly  hi! 14:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Old_Ironstone_Works,_Mells
Hi Rod - this goes back a LONG way, to an edit/comment I made to the page Old_Ironstone_Works,_Mells - apparently back in 2007! I'm not a regular visitor to the edit part of Wikipedia... Anyway, "A comment was made by an editor that this should be titled Iron works rather than Ironstone works. The title was based on the English Nature Citation sheet which is called "Old Ironstone Works, Mells". — Rod talk 20:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)" I'm afraid English Nature got it wrong! My name is James Fussell, I was Secretary of the the FUSSELLS IRON INDUSTRY SOCIETY, and I'm a (retired) geologist with a long-standing interest in industrial archaeology (among other things). 'Old Ironstone Works, Mells' really is an incorrect title! The Lower Works at Mells was, specifically, and like the other 5 Fussells sites in the area, an ironworks where edge tools and some other iron products were manufactured, using imported pig and scrap iron, though there MAY have been some small scale smelting of ore as well. A number of sources, apart from personal knowledge, but they are listed in the References section of the page.

regards, James JFFIIS (talk) 20:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Rod. I'm just posting to let you know that List of scheduled monuments in Bath and North East Somerset – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 15. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 02:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Beckfords tower picture
Hello Rod, re: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Spiral_Staircase._Beckford%27s_Tower.jpg My flickr account used to have some copyrighted images in it which I have now removed and this was why the account was blacklisted. How do I go about removing it from the blacklist? Duncan.Hull (talk) 06:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beckford's Tower
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beckford's Tower you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 10:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Beckford's Tower
The article Beckford's Tower you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beckford's Tower for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

New FLC
Hi Rod. I have nominated List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Buckinghamshire for FLC and should be grateful if you have time to review it.

Do you know that List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Somerset is now out of date as NE has updated for the new local authority boundaries? The list has 127 sites, but NE at has 188. Avon has gone and there is a new County of Bristol with only 6 sites.

I am puzzled that there is now a separate list for West Berkshire as it is the only unitary authority to have its own list. If I ever get round to working on Berkshire I would be tempted to have one list for the county on the ground that the separate list is probably a mistake by NE based on its name. Any views on this? Dudley Miles (talk) 19:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Editor of the Week&thinsp;: nominations needed!
The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven   Talk  for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Axe catchments
Good point, Rodw. Strictly we should use the same form of dab as the main articles i.e. "Axe (Lyme Bay) catchment" and "Axe (Bristol Channel) catchment". I'll go fix that. Thanks for letting me know. No doubt there'll be others! --Bermicourt (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon
Tell me Rod. Would you like to see something like this happen for Somerset/the West Country? See the list of improvements at the bottom.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rod. Where would you like us to host the West Country contest, under WP:England, Wp:Somerset or independent page? WikiProject England/The West Country challenge sound OK?♦ Dr. Blofeld

Bristol International Exhibition

 * Hi User:Rodw, thanks for your message, that enquiry is currently in my manager, Allie's, inbox. We aim to respond to enquiries within two weeks, so she'll get back to you in good time. BRO MarkS (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia
Thanks for welcoming me in a big website. I'm just young but I have knowledge and I also do not like bad grammars and/or if I see a misspelled word, I would edit it if bothered. I am sure many looked up Bristol and pressed on what I've edited, which is the new mayor, and edited his article. Have you done anything lately? I'm sure one of them were you. J editsGood (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Bristol
I live in Bristol, anyways. J editsGood (talk) 20:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I've done WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge/Bristol as an example to fill out.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge/Somerset Pick four photos representing Somerset!♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

File:IMIA.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMIA.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Map-EnglandChewValleyLake.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map-EnglandChewValleyLake.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chewstoke.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Chewstoke.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ChewStokeMap.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ChewStokeMap.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Midfordbrookaqueduct.jpg
Hi Rod, sorry to bother you. In case you haven't noticed I've been moving a lot of your photos of historic landmarks to Commons and adding amplifying information. I noticed you identified the above image as a former canal aqueduct. I was trying to locate the Historic England listing...I found this image which appears to be the same bridge, and based on the geo information found this listing (confusingly duplicated here). The list states that this is a road bridge. There is a railway viaduct nearby that is not listed. Do you think you may have confused this site with another one? I did find some derelict aqueducts from this particular canal that are now road bridges, or simply standing in fields. With much respect - Kelly  hi! 17:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing that File:Midfordaqueduct.jpg is the same structure - if I'm on the right OS map this appears to be an old railway viaduct. Kelly  hi! 18:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Somersetcoalfield.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Somersetcoalfield.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bridgetwishart.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Bridgetwishart.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Purton Hulks
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

I suspected I saw your hand on this article. Congrats for creating an account of a very fascinating subject. -- llywrch (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Chapel Cleeve Manor
Hello Rod. Thanks for your note. The informationon the Chapel Cleeve page is personal and not for public record, especially in this publication. The current owner is offended by its content...and wants it removed. She never wanted a wiki entry so, can you 'unedit' my post or tell me how to delete the entry full stop. Thanks ..AlecCollie (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Rod, I find it odd that it is not the concern of the current owner of the Manor if she wants her information published in one place or not. Yes, the purchase price of the property is available to the public and the fact that the house of on the market. How do you know that she is broke though? How do we know the house needs another half million to renovate it? That is not public record. It may be that the Channel 4 programme said that, but that doesn't mean it is fact and indeed there were many inaccuracies in it.

The issue with the article is that it pulls a lot of this information into one source, which is not acceptable. The owner did not want the original article written, it is a private house.

Is your house value on your wiki page?

I thought under a new EU law, you could request privacy. Does this not apply to Wikipedia? AlecCollie (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

I don't see why Did you have the deciding edit. If I edit this again I don't want you to edit it back. The relationship break up for example, or the cost of the house originally is not required as public interest. You were the one who 'edited' it back....when you have no right too, given it is a 'colaborative' effort. Surely the love of the building and how it was restored by Jeannie is of greater interest than her relationship break up of the original cost. AlecCollie (talk) 20:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The West Country Challenge
This is just a reminder that WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge kicks off today, with the first subject being Bristol. Please remember to post entries under your name at WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge/Bristol. You are receiving this message because you are listed as a participant in the challenge.

Happy editing! --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

West Country Challenge
Hi, just a reminder that the West Country Challenge starts today. The first leg is Bristol. Names are to be added at the bottom of the Bristol page and articles listed. Please also make sure that you add entries you improve/start to the main list on the main page. There will be £10 to win each day for the most points accumulated and then the winner of the county crowed after three days. The overall winner will be decided from the points accumulated from each county round. If you're not interested in winning anything and want to contribute anything you want from the West Country this is fine too though. Best of luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Italianate architecture into Sandridge Park. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added a note on your talk page explaining that I did add the required template (copied) on the talk page of the article within seconds of the edit to the article.&mdash; Rod talk 06:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

6th (Royal Welch) Parachute Battalion
" He was replaced as commanding officer of the 6th Parachute Battalion by Lieutenant-Colonel J. R. Goodwin.[20]"

Should be John Abingdon Goodwin? Above was killed when HMS Abdiel was sunk on the 10th so the chronology of the narrative is poor.

Tbirduk (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Film/Golden Hollywood Contest
Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 07:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Malmesbury Castle...
Rod, I don't think anyone's going to come up with an image for the Malmesbury Castle article anytime soon... It's long been destroyed and, sadly, we don't even know where the castle was located exactly! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dyrham Park
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dyrham Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dyrham Park
The article Dyrham Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dyrham Park for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

FAC voluntary mentoring scheme
During a recent lengthy discussion on the WP:FAC talkpage, several ideas were put forward as to how this procedure could be improved, particularly in making it more user-friendly towards first-time nominees. The promotion rate for first-timers at FAC is depressingly low – around 16 percent – which is a cause for concern. To help remedy this, Mike Christie and I, with the co-operation of the FAC coordinators, have devised a voluntary mentoring scheme, in which newcomers will guided by more experienced editors through the stages of preparation and submission of their articles. The general format of the scheme is explained in more detail on Mentoring for FAC, which also includes a list of editors who have indicated that they are prepared to act as mentors.

Would you be prepared to take on this role occasionally? If so, please add your name to the list. By doing so you incur no obligation; it will be entirely for you to decide how often and on which articles you want to act in this capacity. We anticipate that the scheme will have a trial run for a few months before we appraise its effectiveness. Your participation will be most welcome. Brianboulton (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The 10,000 Challenge
Hi there. I've started a new initiative, the The 10,000 Challenge. It's a long term goal to bring about 10,000 article improvements to the UK and Ireland. Through two contests involving just six or seven weeks of editing so far we've produced over 1500 improvements. Long term if we have more people chipping it and adding articles they've edited independently as well from all areas of the UK then reaching that target is all possible. I think it would be an amazing achievement to see 10,000 article improvements by editors chipping in. If you support this and think you might want to contribute towards this long term please sign up in the Contributors section. No obligations, just post work on anything you feel like whenever you want, though try to avoid basic stubs if possible as we're trying to reduce the overall stub count and improve general comprehension and quality. So if you're working on Somerset articles or whatever anyway, feel free to just add what improvements you've done to the big list. Thanks.

I'll update that main list once the West Country challenge is complete though so don't worry about adding your entries for the contest to it!♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Midsomer name query
Hello Rod, I have left a message on my Talk page in response to the query you left there. Hope that helps. Peteinterpol (talk) 09:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

The West Country Challenge: Bronze Medal
Thanks Rod for your help in drawing it up and competing yourself, making it a considerable success. Hope you enjoyed it!♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Dyrham Park
Verey and Brooks (Pevsner 2000) has a good entry for Dyrham. If you don't have access, I could add a little. KJP1 (talk) 11:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Geography of Somerset
When I took on working on the article Geography of Somerset, I did not realise that you have been working on it periodically since at least 2009. You are welcome to join with me in trying to bring it to GA status if you wish. Some parts of the article were unreferenced and I find it easier to rewrite sections from the sources I have rather than try to find sources for the existing text, but I have no wish to offend anyone.

Not many counties have geography articles. On the whole, I am aiming to replicate the structure of Geography of Wales which I took to GA during the "Awaken the Dragon" contest. The section "The changing face of Somerset" I propose to remove entirely, the first half is essay-like and the second half is interesting but too detailed, and anyway off-topic. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Dyrham Park ref
Hi Rod. I see Dyrham Park is up at one of the preps for DYK. The "around 1511" is mildly confusing for me as the source you use for that claim says "In 1511 a licence...." with no vagaries surrounding the year. I've even noticed that image caption which gives the precise date, not just year (Royal licence to empark Dyrham granted by king Henry VIII to William Denys, Esquire of the Body, 5 June 1511) Is there a reason you've changed it to "around 1511"? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Dyrham Park
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

FLC
Hi Rod. I have List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Essex at FLC, and I should be grateful for a review if you have time. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

The 10,000 Challenge
Hi, at The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

John Chubb (artist) Comment
Hi Rod. Thanks for tweaking this. Much appreciated. Apwoolrich (talk) 10:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for putting me straight. Though I have been a WP editor for 12 years +, I have only created nearly 100 articles from scratch, so I do sometimes trip up on the finer points! I am Hon Curator of the Blake Museum, and we have just digitised as TIFFs the entire Chubb collection. We intend to publish an illustrated catalogue of them in due course. Kind regards. Apwoolrich (talk) 12:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, Wells, Somerset. Re the Museum, we close for casual callers directly after Bridgwater Carnival and re-open next Easter. We shut entirely from mid-December till after New Year, apart from a daily key-holder inspection. However, during shut-down, when we re-jig displays and do maintenance, visitors are very welcome by appointment.Depending on what we are doing it could be a bit messy in some of the galleries. I am regularly in on Mondays and Thursdays 10am ish - 3pm ish. I would be very glad to meet you. Kind regards. Apwoolrich (talk) 13:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Copyright issue
Hi, Thanks for your copyright notification, I'll refine from cut and paste jobs in the future! Cymrogogoch (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

King William Ale House
Sorry. I always forget DYK includes expansions. I'll correct the text; probably a little late. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Reg Meuross
Hi I've looked at Reg Meuross page and it seems greatly improved… can the comments at the top be removed now or is there still work to do? Many thanks. (Ktwhitehouse (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC))

Mentoring?
Hi Rodw,

As I've nominated a few articles at WP:GAN, I think it's only proper that I help with the reviewing. I have avoided this in the past mainly because I don't have huge amounts of time to spare and when I have had time to comment at WP:PR or WP:FAC, I haven't felt that my comments were particularly well recieved. I was hoping that if I chose an article to review in a subject area close to your heart, you might babysit me through the process. I am hoping that this won't mean much extra work for you; just keeping an eye on things and making sure my comments are in line. I've chosen you because you've reviewed some of my work in the past and I've found your feedback to be helpful and delicately phrased. If you don't have time or aren't interested, I completely understand and their will be no hard feelings so please don't feel obliged.

Best regards--Ykraps (talk) 16:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Musgrove Park Hospital pages
Dear Rod

I have just seen your email about changes I made to our Wikipedia page. All the changes I made were correct and address the many inaccuracies in the current page that are misleading to the public. I understand your concerns and policy around us not being able to edit the page ourselves as we are impartial so I wonder whether you could please send me a copy of the updates I made so I can update the "Future Plans" bit and then perhaps send to you for a proof read and inclusion?

I hope this would be okay.

Best wishes,

Paul Hopkins Communications officer Musgrove Park Hospital

(Musgroveparkhospital (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC))

Clevedon
Hello, re Clevedon Education section, I think if they aren't performing any more the school dramatic society should come out, but I'll leave the decision up to you. Best Christmas wishes, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 11:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Wallabrook
Sorry, I have removed the clapper bridge picture you added, because it is of the wrong Walla Brook, ie the one which is a tributary of the Teign, not the one which is a tributary of the Tavy. There are several of the beasts.---Ehrenkater (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)