User talk:Roflaoman

November 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1200–1300 in European fashion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

I am afraid I will have to inform you that what I entered was correct due to how rare silk was at the time it made it worth a high amount and to "flaunt their riches" they would acquire jewels and expensive clothing.Ω

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

may I ask how the hell adding valid information is vandilisim?Ω

I will also alert you to the fact that if I am accused of vandilisim again that wikipedias usage will significantly decrease. Ω


 * This, this , and this aren't constructive, no matter how many other edits you made that were OK. Stop it.   Acroterion   (talk)   17:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

don't worry I removed the joke and answer to the joke but the omega is a mark that my believes demand that I leave behind after everything I do Ω

and if the silkworm part was "constructive" then why did you remove it? Ω
 * You mixed vandalism into everything else. It's not up to us to sort out your bad edits from the good. And you may not place omegas into articles. Sign your comments as Wikipedia requires, and don't sign at all in articles.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You mixed vandalism into everything else. It's not up to us to sort out your bad edits from the good. And you may not place omegas into articles. Sign your comments as Wikipedia requires, and don't sign at all in articles.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

you should relax some man listenΩ

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * No omegas, please.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

ill add back in the silkworm part and sign with the omega in the summary is that ok? Ω
 * No, you will use the edit summary for a short summary of your edit. No omega, please respect the project's rules.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

do you mind me adding a page on nuclear fusion? Ω
 * The subject is pretty well covered at nuclear fusion, you know. Now, please start signing your posts as requested.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

fine ill add the silkworm only, ok? Ω

fine Ω Roflaoman (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

happy? Ω Roflaoman (talk) 18:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for learning how to sign posts.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

where do I put it on the edit for the fashion? Ω Roflaoman (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You don't, it's part of the attribution history . Content is otherwise unmarked by contributors.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

there silkworm info added Ω Roflaoman (talk) 18:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC) okay fine Ω Roflaoman (talk) 18:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC) do you have stuff 4 the Edwardian influence? Ω Roflaoman (talk) 16:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

do you have stuff on Edwardian influence?Ω