User talk:RogerDP

if you look into the email by the conference team, they write:

"We cordially invite you to be a session chair in our conference. Please contact the organizing committee by e-mail (cite@highsci.org) no later than November 15, 2008 if you would like to organize a session, and please include your brief CV in your letter."

Thats why the term 'invite' is certainly correct.

The conference organizers report that they sent this e-mail in response to a solicitation from the "author". It is to be assumed that the (anonymous) editing is being carried out by one of the hoaxers?

Hey RogerDP, go get yourself a girlfriend instead of editing in wikipedia all day long —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.234.181 (talk) 19:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

-> where do they write this? read the entire story first instead of spreading your false messages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.78.199.199 (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

It's remarkable that, having perpetrated a fraud, those responsible seem to need to deny the facts by continuing to edit the article anonymously to justify their actions. You've made the point that it's possible, by being dishonest, to get a fake paper into a large conference but you should at least admit the truth about the methods you employed.

btw, it wasn't me who published the paper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.78.199.199 (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

It's worth noting that the original hoax paper submission originated in Germany and that all the anonymous edits which aim to re-write the history also originate from Germany.

Maybe you don't know, but i think more than 1 or 2 people in Germany do have Internet access —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.78.194.64 (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)