User talk:RogerNTaber

Welcome
Hello, RogerNTaber, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you have edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! &mdash; Rod talk 11:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Poems & promotional material
Thank you for your edits to Porlock, Watchet and Dunster, however they appear to be largely an attempt to promote your forthcoming book which is not an appropriate use of wikipedia (see Self_promotion. I have moved to entries to the cultural references section of each article and removed the comment about the forthcoming publication. I also couldn't find the reference on the BBC Somerset site to the Porlock poem.&mdash; Rod talk 11:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Reference on Porlock
I note you have added "that can be seen on the official BBC Somerset website." as a reference several times on the Porlock article. Please see Citing sources which provides guidance on this. If you can give the URL of the web page I can help format the reference if that would assist.&mdash; Rod talk 12:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I've now found it & added the reference.&mdash; Rod talk 12:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)