User talk:Roger Belmar

Michael Fagan incident
Hi! Thinks for your work on the Michael Fagan incident article. However, Wikipedia doesn't normally mention the names of people who are otherwise unknown unless they've been convicted, due to the possible risk of harm to people found to be not guilty. We can cover the events, and mention that a person was charged, but we don't typically mention them by name. - Bilby (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=589135779 your edit] to Michael Fagan incident may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * YARD'S REPORT ON JULY 9 INTRUSION INTO BUCKINGHAM PALACE" The New York Times 22 July 1982] was a famous Buckingham Palace intruder who broke into the Queen's

Editing
Please consider using the "Preview" function (to avoid lots of minor edits) and more importantly using edit summaries to briefly describe your changes. Also, please avoid overlinking; i.e., if there is already a wikilink to Queen Elizabeth II, you don't need to add links to subsequent mentions. Thanks, OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Belmar


A tag has been placed on David Belmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Combie Tractor  18:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)