User talk:Roger Camotes

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:PSGCstyle


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Randor1980 – t c 02:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slant
Template:Slant has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * It is not necessary to add the slant template or italics to all mottoes in the infobox. Italics should actually only be used for foreign language terms, see MOS:ITALIC. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata Issue and KrBot
I noticed you reverted my edit when I replaced the wikidata with the bare file name, specifically at the Garcia Hernandez, Bohol page. I tried putting the flag image using wikidata bot a Russian bot called Krbot in wikidata keeps reverting such edits. I suspect the bot reverts the edit since Flag of Garcia_Hernandez, Bohol.png is not in the commons. I temporarily remedy this problem by putting the bare file name back in the infobox to keep it from being deleted due to not being used in a particular time period. --Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Fatima, Bohol that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses @ 14:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:I dream of horses. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I dream of horses @ 14:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * it wasn't at all a personal attack, it was an expression of anger at the fact you'd taken a fully-working page and rendered it completely unusable, error-strewn with half the information missing. Nothing personal at all.  I do hate editors who think they're contributing by damaging good pages, and either not bothering to check if they'd made a mess, or going away knowing it's bad.  If that's the output from your bot, it needs a rethink.  Can't get personal about bots.  Spend more time taking care of what you do and less time posing in front of a mirror.--Roger Camotes (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, I don't even have a bot, so you can get personal. Calling my edits preposterious is a personal opinion, and putting "work" when you ask "Do you ever check your 'work'"? is very much a personal attack. Put your feelings aside and be civil for now on. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 15:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Official URL
Template:Official URL has been nominated for merging with Template:URL. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)