User talk:Rogerd/Archive001

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Rogerd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! &mdash; Stevie is the man!  Talk 11:10, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Harland Sanders
I didn't mean to change the apostrophe; I was just reverting another edit and didn't notice that. Thanks for catching it! &mdash;tregoweth 03:23, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

US Gov images
Thanks for tagging these. You can leave them on PUI, I will remove it when I check the images to be moved to Phase II. Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 08:40, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

Rahal Letterman Racing
I was going to create a stub when I saw it red linked a while ago; before I could you had written a good article, much better than my stub would have been. Thanks. Rlquall 02:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Plantar fasciitis
I do not always manage to deep-check a link for serious content. The URL that was inserted on plantar fasciitis was obviously designed to attract lots of search engine traffic, and had the smell of an ad to it. With the rate medical articles are spammed with links on a daily basis, I'm sometimes pressed for time to weed out what are good external links.

IMHO there should be a clampdown on external links. Wikipedia would be much more served by automatically generated links based on Google PageRank than those selected by anonymous IPs with an agenda to push. JFW | T@lk  07:24, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delfino vandalism
Thanks for helping with the Delfino vandalism. I just wanted to make sure you're aware of User:Kmccoy/Delfino, where I'm keeping track of some of this stuff. kmccoy (talk) 05:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stewart Airport
Thanks for the compliment. I covered Stewart's privatization as a reporter; I know this history off the top of my head. Daniel Case 05:26, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Appreciated
I just want to drop a line to say I appreciate all the work you do in the Wikipedia, esp. with regards to Louisville-related articles. &mdash; Stevie is the man!  Talk 16:29, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Reverting
Hi. The text is an automatic summary generated by Wikipedia's software. It is given to those users who are administrators, like myself. There is a link saying [rollback] for the last diff to a page. There is a method using Javascript for non-admins, but I don't know where this is. Sorry I can't be more help! Cheers, smoddy 13:23, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

RE: Hellfighters (movie)
Guess we know what your watching tonight. WikiDon

Lincoln/Vote
Please look at the restructured choices on Talk:Lincoln/Vote and clarify your vote. Thanks! &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 08:37, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Lincoln/Vote
There have been some changes to the poll, I would encourage you to revisit it. Agriculture 15:54, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Hudson revert war
Thank you for your note. However, if you would kindly take a glance through Bee Hive's user contributions you would notice that the entirety of his edits have consisted of deleting and reverting most any significant changes to material I have made within the last several weeks. If you also would take a look at the contributions of Ruy Lopez you would notice that this comes off the heels of mostly the very same reversions which were picked up by "Bee Hive". In other words, there is not really a dispute at this page per se, but merely the dispute of a user against myself. --TJive 00:24, July 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * It is beyond an Rfc by this point, but action will come. Also, "Bee Hive" was apparently just banned by Jayjg.  --TJive 03:39, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Louisville, Kentucky
Greetings. In the past, you've contributed to the Louisville, Kentucky article. I thought you'd like to know that it's currently being voted on as a featured article. If you'd like to vote, you can do so at Featured article candidates/Louisville, Kentucky. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 14:28, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Re: The Pacifier revert
I was responding to Vandalism in progress -. Like a good cow, I followed other's lead and might have jumped the gun. If I'm wrong, please revert my edit. I hope I have a couple more days where "sorry, I'm new" will be acceptable! Duncan Delp 16:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)