User talk:Rogerdpack

1

Little context in OwnerOccupancyCovenant
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on OwnerOccupancyCovenant, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because OwnerOccupancyCovenant is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting OwnerOccupancyCovenant, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Motion
Hi. Please see Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages). External links are completely forbidden in disambiguation pages. Otherwise we would have a continual problem with spam in them. The item you want to link to must either have an article, or be prominently discussed within another existing article, in order to warrant a link within a disambiguation page. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm sorry to have to be exacting, but there really does have to be some content already existing, that we can point readers to. Think of disambiguation pages as "signposts at a crossroads" - they point to existing things within Wikipedia, not things that might someday be.
 * If the software is currently not mentioned anywhere in Wikipedia, then we cannot include it in the disambiguation page.


 * You might like to start an article about the software. See Article wizard, for a guide. See and ask at WikiProject Software/Free Software for assistance. The only requirements for an article, are a few independent (non-primary) sources.
 * HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 22:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Evergreen and Reliable Sources
Hi, I noticed your recent edit on Mormons. I realize that Evergreen is not the most reliable source, but so far, it is the best source I can find. I would like for the article to give some estimate of how many Mormons there are who deal with same-sex-attraction, and I was wondering if you have any reliable sources you could recommend. I am considering re-adding the information, but with a reliable source template so that somebody with more experience can edit, provide a source, and perhaps a better number. -- Adjwilley (talk) 22:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Sure go for it. Rogerdpack (talk) 23:09, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Divine Comedy (comedy troupe)


A tag has been placed on Divine Comedy (comedy troupe) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. User:Namiba 13:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

FYI
A discussion that may interest you: Wikipedia_talk:Editing policy. Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

MOS:LDS change discussion
A change to a provision at MOS:LDS regarding capitalization in titles is currently being discussed at that you might be interested in. Please participate in the discussion there, thanks. --FyzixFighter (talk) 12:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Motion (surveillance software)


The article Motion (surveillance software) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Open web drawing revision 0.JPG


The file File:Open web drawing revision 0.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused image, no context to determine possible future use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)