User talk:Rogper~enwiki/2007-2011


 * archived talks
 * User talk:Rogper/2003-2007

AfD nomination of Vagina gentium
Vagina gentium, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Vagina gentium satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Vagina gentium and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Vagina gentium during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  02:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Ditt användarnamn
Hej!

Jag chansar på att du ser det här inom rimlig tid :-)

Jag och användare Caesar på svenska Wikipedia har skrivit en mediwiki-manual. Vi har i den använt texter från Wikipedia och du är en av huvudförfattarna till dessa texter på Wikipedia, enligt GFDL har du rätt att bli krediterad som huvudförfattare, enligt detta stycke:

"List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or entities responsible for authorship of the modifications in the Modified Version, together with at least five of the principal authors of the Document (all of its principal authors, if it has fewer than five), unless they release you from this requirement."

.SE som skall ge ut texten undrar nu om du antingen kan tänka dig att i stället krediteras som huvudförfattare under ditt riktiga namn (eftersom de inte vill ha pseudonymer som författare), eller alternativt kan tänka dig att avstå från att bli krediterad som huvudförfattare?

Om du skickar mig ett Wiki-mejl från ditt konto med ditt svar skulle jag bli glad, alternativt svarar inloggad här eller på sv.wiki.

MiCkE 14:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DAT (record company)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article DAT (record company), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * no indication of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rettetast (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

File:System of conductors.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:System of conductors.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)