User talk:RohanMalik

Speedy deletion of Khiladi 420
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Khiladi 420, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Tyrol5  [Talk]  23:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
The recent edit you made to the page Khiladi 420 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Techman224 Talk  23:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Likewise with that "Prince and Pauper" edit. The title simply doesn't match the content. Please write the title under the proper title and please don't engage in an edit war. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi again. Please write the article under its proper title with sufficient content to identify the subject. I assume it's about a relatively new movie. Simply rolling back the redirect is unhelpful. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)