User talk:Rohan man

Speedy deletion nomination of Chha Ekan Chha
Hello Rohan man,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chha Ekan Chha for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 1900toni (talk) 14:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kismat 2
Hello Rohan man,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kismat 2 for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 1900toni (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohan Rai


A tag has been placed on Rohan Rai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helmut von Moltke (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourselfat Rohan Rai. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 17:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself
Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Autobiography.

The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 17:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Kismat 2) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Kismat 2, Rohan man!

Wikipedia editor WebCite just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hello, Wikipedian. This message is to let you know the article you recently created has been reviewed. Happy editing!"

To reply, leave a comment on WebCite's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Kismat (2007 film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kismat (2007 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prithivi Raj Prasai


The article Prithivi Raj Prasai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Befikre. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

For your unsourced addition here at Befikre despite a very obvious note instructing you to provide a quality reference. If you do not know how to add sources, please see Referencing for Beginners. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prithivi Raj Prasai


A tag has been placed on Prithivi Raj Prasai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohhan Rai


A tag has been placed on Rohhan Rai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr. Vernon (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

You've been blocked twice before for submitting unsourced content, yet you create an article with no references, add financial data with no references, change financial details that are properly sourced, etc. In addition, you add editorial content about films being "flops" or "super hit"s. This tone is completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We're not writing a fan website, this is an encyclopedia, and content must be presented in a neutral point of view. Lastly, you've at least twice created pointless articles about yourself. This is disruptive. Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Since I don't get the sense you understand what Wikipedia's goals are, I have interrupted your editing privileges so you can spend more time learning about some of our rules. See WP:OR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Refugee (2016 film)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Refugee (2016 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:90B4:84F6:8E11:97F5 (talk) 03:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kismat 2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kismat 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kismat 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)