User talk:Rohirim42-97H

October 2023
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Comicsgate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi AntiDionysius, my changes were, in fact, constructive, as they ensured the removal of bias from the information displayed. Therefore undoing the changes that I made suggests a lack of good intent on your part, as the citations for the restored misinformation cannot be verified, and also suggests a clear bias in favour of said misinformation. To keep the information free of bias, factually false information should not be displayed on this or any other page. Rohirim42-97H (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The information isn't false; it's well-sourced. While it's not ideal that some portions of the sources are behind paywalls, this does not make the information untrue, is not grounds for deletion of the content, and, perhaps most importantly, the basic claim (that Comicsgate is part of the alt-right) is viewable in the non-paywalled portion of several of the sources. Please also review Wikipedia's Assume Good Faith policy. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Comicsgate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Washington Post is wp:RS Adakiko (talk) 20:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Comicsgate, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Removal factually false information is not disruptive editing, it's ensuring that the available information if free of bias. I make these changes in good faith and with only the best intent, but the restoration of this unverifiable information signals nothing but ill intent on yours and others' parts. Rohirim42-97H (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Removing, rather. Rohirim42-97H (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * As has been explained to you, the information isn't false. It's backed up by four separate high-quality sources. By continuing to assert that your intentions are pure and therefore others must be engaged in malfeasance, you are also contravening the WP:AGF policy. Frankly, it doesn't matter what your intentions are. Please do not remove well-sourced content without a better reason than your own assertion that it is false. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You have not given evidence for it being false. Adakiko (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Edit Warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Comicsgate. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Note: Your edits have been reverted by three different editors. Adakiko (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Comicsgate. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 20:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)