User talk:Rohit nit

Hello Rohit
Please check the Reddy page it has the term 'reddy' written in telugu script exactly the same way as I did in Y Venugopal Reddy page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavn123 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Professional guidance?
None of us are even remotely "professional" wikipedians, I'm afraid, so you might have some difficulty finding real professional guidance here. Regarding working on content related to India, I do know that WikiProject India and all the projects related to it, which are listed at WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/Asia, could definitely use some more help. All the projects everywhere could use some help, actually. If you could give me a better idea of what particular kind of content or activities you'd be interested in, that would probably help a bit. Regarding the request for adoption, I have no reservations, although I would want to make it clear that my knowledge of India in general is probably not the most thorough of all the editors I know. I would be willing to offer what help I can, based on my acquaintance with wikipedia in general, though. John Carter (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, images is not one of my strong points. If you were to hit the "Upload file" link in the "Toolbox" bar on the left though, and indicate that you release the image as free use and that the image isn't of a copyrighted subject (like a movie poster, for instance) in the Summary and Licensing sections of the upload form, you shouldn't have too many problems. Regarding doing reviews, there are basically two kinds, the assessments and the peer reviews. Assessments are the Stub, Start, B, GA, A, FA, etc. ratings in the project banners on the talk pages, and peer reviews are the specific, generally detailed reviews of articles which are being considered for improvement and/or GA or FA consideration. Doing assessments is fairly easy. GA and FA are already determined in all cases, as there is a formal process to go through to get that rating. The other ratings can be found summarized at WikiProject India/Assessment and the various similar pages many other projects have, most of which copy the standards of Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment fairly closely, and just following the guidelines is enough to get started with ratings. Trust me, after a while, it gets very easy. There are generally less people involved in peer review, as it is a bit more time-consuming, but also generally more useful to the article itself. Generally, in peer reviews, people try to point out any weaknesses they see in the article to help it reach GA or FA status. Regarding India related peer reviews specifically, User:Ncmvocalist has a lot of experience in that subject, and would be a good person to contact as well. I'm going to try to help in the India reviews as well, as time permits, but it ain't permitting much right now. Both kinds of reviews are very helpful in general, though.
 * If you wanted to see how assessments work in practice, one thing I did initially was just go through a few categories and try to place a banner on the talk page of an article I think is relevant to a given project on any talk pages that don't already have it. For India, I imagine that there are quite a few that don't. By doing so, you'll get a chance to see what common characteristics the various grades of article have in practice by seeing the various articles that have been rated, while at the same time placing the banner on any articles missing them, thus letting both the project and the editors of that page know that the project is at least interested in them. You'd be free to assess them as well, but I remember how some of my own early assessments later struck me as being a little hard to justify, and that might happen to you too. But those would probably be the first steps that come to mind to me anyway. John Carter (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For fair use and free use questions, Non-free content is the existing guideline. Basically, if a fair-use image usefully illustrates the article, then it can be included. The major exceptions are if there is an equivalent free use image, in which case that free use image is preferred. Regarding formatting, it helps to know that skipping a line literally shows as a skipped line. Leaving blank lines in templates makes the templates look huge and unwieldy. Remember not to hit "return" when finishing content to be added to a template, just arrow down to the next line. And only one blank line or Return is required between paragraphs. Unfortunately, there are a lot of such matters, most of which can be found in Manual of style and its various subpages. They can and often do take a bit of getting used to. John Carter (talk) 15:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review
Did you want to nominate an article for peer review in WikiProject India/Peer review? You need to replace the 'Name of nominated article' text with the title of the article you want peer reviewed. --RegentsPark (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Adoption?
I'd be happy to, but only if you don't mind having an adopter who's around only scarsely and is really outdated in terms of keeping up to the community's rules... --Deryck C. 19:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes that's it. Thanks for being my adoptee. Anything that you'd like me to explain to start with? --Deryck C. 10:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I formalized this by changing your adoptme to adopted|Deryck Chan. however if you are looking for a co-adopter, feel free to re-add the   to your userpage. best regards, xenocidic (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Logo10.jpg
An image that you used or altered, Image:Logo10.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Amog |T a l k 08:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

NIT Peer Review
You can add stuff even if you don't have references. But you should be aware that unreferenced material is easy to challenge (not that that is likely!) and an article with few references to back up the claims is unlikely to be a featured article (see WP:FAC and WP:FACR). But it is better to be complete even if you don't have references. Copyedit refers to checking the article thoroughly for grammar, spelling and sentence construction. I suggest you first make all your changes and then submit the article to the copyedit section (WP:LOCE). You look like you're on the right track anyway!--RegentsPark (talk) 02:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Current events portal
I'm not really up on current events in India but will try to add quotes when I see something. Do you think you could take charge of the quote box and update it regularly? Especially if you have access to Indian newspapers. --RegentsPark (talk) 23:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

To archive news items, click on the archive link (next to the edit link on the top right corner of a box) and copy the text into the archive page (noting the appropriate date). Then you can delete the old news and replace it by whatever comes up.--Swans and ducks (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Please add the sources of news articles in parantheses. For instance:
 * Lord Swaraj Paul, British Parlimentarian severely criticized over his comments on West Bengal government's handling of Singur. (The Times of India)
 * I hope this helps. Thanks for contributing! Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 10:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * To give you an idea, I've formatted the newslinks on Portal:India/news. Please pay a visit to this page for a better perspective on updating this page. Thanks for your contributions. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Good job with the latest additions! You have gotten the idea now. The only thing that will be better off is without a repetitive use of the sources. If you notice, I tried the diversify the sources (reliable ones, that is). Otherwise, good work. I try updating this page once in a while but actual article editing and improvements keep me busy. I suppose that you are interested in maintaining this portion periodically. It would be great if you can take this up. Btw, you seem to have an origin from Andhra Pradesh, isn't it? I do too. Where are you from? Mspraveen (talk) 11:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi there. Good to hear about you. I'm a working professional based in Hyderabad. Good luck with your graduation. Should you need any assistance while on wikipedia, holler me for help. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 16:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello! Nice to see you regularly and vociferously updating the Current Events portal. Great work! Further to this, there is detailed current events portal in which you can notice sections below - "India in this week..." and update with multiple news items of that day. Only the most important news items of the day could be in the news section. Would you be willing to further contribute to this portal? Thoughts?? Mspraveen (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Brackets
Thanks for asking - I suppose you've forgotten the double closing brackets? They're *double* opening and *double* closing square brackets. --Deryck C. 21:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Is it possible that you didn't save the page properly, or your account was blocked temporarily because you used a rotating shared IP? I didn't see any edit history of you adding category tags. --Deryck C. 11:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * When in doubt, don't use the preview. It's better to make a mistake and revert yourself than to think you made a mistake when it's actually the preview program that was making the mistake. There are lots of things that the preview tends to screw up on. --Deryck C. 15:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Adoption
I think you're doing just fine (I took a look at your contributions). But, will be happy to make myself available to answer questions and help out on the off-chance that you get into trouble! --Regents Park (Feed my swans) 12:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Collaboration of the week
The purpose of COTW is to take one article and to collaboratively, i.e., several wikipedians work on the article, raise it to some standard (either a Good article or a Featured article. You need a few conditions for a good candidate for COTW:

1. The article should be reasonably fleshed out. Which means that the main sections should already be there and there should be plenty of text to work with. 2. There should not be any edit wars going on. (Otherwise the COTW will not work!)

Usually, the many editors then get together and find citations, do a complete copy edit, add pictures, whatever it takes to get the article to the next level.

If you take this on, don't forget to drop messages on the talk pages of the various editors involved (see the edit history) and also in the talk pages of other people with an interest in India articles. I think it is a great idea to revive this feature! --Regents Park (Feed my swans) 13:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

You can also get the edit history of the article through this link which will give you a much better picture of who the main editors are or have been. --Regents Park (Feed my swans) 14:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

comment on jimi hendrix article
i saw your talk point. i just wrote the liner notes exactly as they were written, not from my own perspective so any use of I or my etc is from the notes themselves. I hope I have done an ok job of this as I am new to this. I just thought I would pass along my knowledge of the item mentioned (the cd lifelines). any info or help you have is appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ray from texas (talk • contribs) 22:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

A notice to all WP:IND members for comments
Hi Rohit. There is a proposal out on Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics that you might find interesting. I think it would be a good way for you to organize your contributions to India related topics. --Regents Park (roll amongst the roses) 19:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar:Good work

 * Hi Rohit. I'm kinda confused as to which regions you've updated. Can you possibly wikilink/link them on my talk page? Thanks again for your efforts. You were not seen around in the recent weeks. Busy in real life? Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 14:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Rohit. Nice work there. At least with your good efforts, the page seems to have a semblance of an Indian news portal. However, there are other aspects such as the calender actually being of use in terms of wikilinking to the news articles of an associated day in the month and so on. You have other ideas on how the whole portal can be improved? Maintaining anyways is a task in itself, which I see you're doing very well. Keep me posted. Have a good weekend! Mspraveen (talk) 11:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello there. Actually, I thought my browser had a problem when I was unable to see the calender dates not linking to anything. But, I'm actually not sure how it is supposed to work. I will ask User:Ganeshk (a sysop from WP:India) who might lend us additional information about this. Keep up the good work. How were your semester exams? What are you a student of, btw? Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 16:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Portal
Hi Rohit. I was away with no internet access for a couple of weeks. I assume that the issue worked itself out somehow (it looks fine to me). Excellent work, BTW! --Regents Park (roll amongst the roses) 17:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Meaning of Rohit
THe Meaning of Word Rohit is Cloud too.

Because rohit means the one who cry for benifit of someone else. Which only a cloud can do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.32.116 (talk) 08:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sowcar janaki young.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sowcar janaki young.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk  02:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sowcar janaki old.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Sowcar janaki old.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yv Reddy.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Yv Reddy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for List of NIT Srinagar alumni
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of NIT Srinagar alumni, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 08:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

sir while searching NIT srinagar at GOOGLE there appears a newspaper cutting instead of the institute's logo ... which is a bad symptom please try to remove it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramanujan Das Patra (talk • contribs) 08:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)