User talk:Rohith Kilari

March 2016
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Laptop. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Laptop. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 15:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Rohith, if you keep adding tollyspice.com to articles, your account will be blocked indefinitely and the site will be added to the spam blacklist. Wikipedia isn't the place to advertise, and we only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking have to say about any given subject. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * How did you know tollyspice.com had been added to the spam blacklist? And how do you figure that removing tollyspice.com from the blacklist will improve Wikipedia? The site serves no useful purpose as a reliable source, because it's a blog. So if we removed it from the blacklist, then what? We'd have to keep removing a problematic source from Wikipedia? That doesn't seem to make any sense. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)