User talk:Rohitlukkha

Welcome!
Hello, Rohitlukkha, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Hari Parbat, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — kashmiri  TALK  08:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Offensive content on Hari Parbat?
Hello, thank you for your edits. However, I don't see what is so offensive about the content that you keep removing from Hari Parbat that it must be removed from Wikipedia. Would you mind providing an explanation? --MorbidEntree (talk) 09:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello

As per wikipedia article itself, this hill is sacred for all major religious communities in India and calling it Koh-e-Maran which means hill of satan (or demon) is offensive and highly objectionable to 1.25 billion people of India. Posting such online content is also a punishable offence under section 295A of the Indian Penal Code. You might not see anything offensive in it but all Indians and as well as Indian law does. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohitlukkha (talk • contribs) 03:41, 25 May 2016‎
 * I agree that it is objectionable to call it that, but, if it is called that normally along with its Indian name, then it should be included within the article. --MorbidEntree (talk) 15:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not subject to laws of India. And "Koh-e-Maran" is a widely used name which is well-confirmed in sources, so it definitely belongs to an encyclopaedia. — kashmiri  TALK  18:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent editing history at Hari Parbat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — kashmiri  TALK  17:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Hari Parbat, you may be blocked from editing. ''We already came to consensus on your talk page that this content is in scope of the Wikipedia project. Please stop removing this.'' MorbidEntree (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — kashmiri  TALK  22:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Hari Parbat
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)