User talk:Rohitphy

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Frvernchanezzz (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- - (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 14:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- - (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 14:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Standing wave
Thanks for your contribution, but I have moved it to Talk:Standing wave for the time being until it can be cleaned up and referenced. For guidance in doing this yourself, see Manual of Style and Citing sources. Thanks. OrangeDog  (τ • ε) 18:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits to Gravitation
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Insulam Simia (talk) 09:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Top islamic indian businessman
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Top islamic indian businessman, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://twocircles.net/2011oct29/four_muslims_among_top_100_rich_indians.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Top islamic indian businessman


A tag has been placed on Top islamic indian businessman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from twocircles.net/2011oct29/four_muslims_among_top_100_rich_indians.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -&copy;2015 Compassionate727( Talk )( Contributions ) 17:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of War thermodynamics


A tag has been placed on War thermodynamics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Delhi riots February 2000 fake news
Some pages in Wikipedia uploaded regarding Delhi riots in February 2000 are published with half one sided biased news shouting Muslims are victims and initiated by Hindus which is totally wrong. (1) It shows that riot started due to one BJP leader Kapil Mishra, but let us come to chronology that it’s citizenships amendment act which is about providing citizenship to to any foreign national and this act was misinformed to Muslims by political parties (other than BJP ) as anti Muslim law. It lead to Shaheen Bagh protest where Sharjeel Imam talked about cutting north east part of India as separate nation. Lot of public properties vandalised.Next a Muslim leader Waris Pathan quoted that we 150 million Muslims will dominate over one billion Hindus. In JNU they protested by writing “fuck hindutva “ and “Brahmin go away”. In AMU protestors slogans were “ we need freedom of Jinnah “, “we want freedom from hindutva “ and “ hindutva will be engraved “. This created chaos in country as this was anti national and it created a blockage on highway for months and protest turned anti national. There are other provocative statements from leaders like Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Mamta Banerjee , Amanatullah Khan, Owaisi and others. Kapil Mishra came in picture at last as to clear the road blockage due to protest. Except Muslim till no other religion people were involved. (2)Hindu, Sikh ,Jain and Christians were only watching protest not only in Delhi but also at other part of country. But till protest grows anti national and anti society people of other religion start to persuade and convince Muslims to avoid such foolishness. Even Delhi high court sent mediators but protestors are continuously paid by Extremist group PFI. Protestors refused to accept CAA. Now this protestors mob arrested Delhi in unlawful manner. Protestors use to get nude in front of Hindu girls and they call them. (4)High court and Delhi government of AAP had not yet passed any order regarding protest then other than Muslims start to demonstrate in support of CAA where Kapil Mishra came in role. (5)Now it’s time where these two group of demonstrators came and stone pelting started. It’s Bheem army also came in suspicious role. But here there were pre prepared CAA protestors whose number grown in thousands with all arrangements made in advance. They marked Hindu, Jain and Sikh shops in advance and Muslim didn’t sent their kid to school on the day riot started. This planning was observed by few and video proofs are there. Now mob started rioting against common public. Wikipedia pages shown this mosque burnt but not shown Hindu temples damaged and burnt. More than 30 Hindus died with few Muslim. Few Muslims killed by Muslims due to some unknown reason or mistake. But killing of Hindus was brutal. Hindu girls returning from tuition were marched nude to their home. Maximum loss is suffered by Hindus. IB cons table death was one of brutal incident who stabbed 400 times till 4 hours and his visceral organs were cut out from stomach, Suspect is AAP leader Tahir Hussain along with 4 more murders is now fugitive. Congress leader Ishrat Jahan is now in police custody for provocative speech. There are 62 FIR till date and around 600 arrests. I dictated only a dilute version of this riot which was wrongly presented victim Hindu as culprits not in Wikipedia but also in Washington Post, BBC etc Rohitphy (talk) 18:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Some pages in Wikipedia uploaded regarding Delhi riots in February 2000 are published with half one sided biased news shouting Muslims are victims and initiated by Hindus which is totally wrong. (1) It shows that riot started due to one BJP leader Kapil Mishra, but let us come to chronology that it’s citizenships amendment act which is about providing citizenship to to any foreign national and this act was misinformed to Muslims by political parties (other than BJP ) as anti Muslim law. It lead to Shaheen Bagh protest where Sharjeel Imam talked about cutting north east part of India as separate nation. Lot of public properties vandalised.Next a Muslim leader Waris Pathan quoted that we 150 million Muslims will dominate over one billion Hindus. In JNU they protested by writing “fuck hindutva “ and “Brahmin go away”. In AMU protestors slogans were “ we need freedom of Jinnah “, “we want freedom from hindutva “ and “ hindutva will be engraved “. This created chaos in country as this was anti national and it created a blockage on highway for months and protest turned anti national. There are other provocative statements from leaders like Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Mamta Banerjee , Amanatullah Khan, Owaisi and others. Kapil Mishra came in picture at last as to clear the road blockage due to protest. Except Muslim till no other religion people were involved. (2)Hindu, Sikh ,Jain and Christians were only watching protest not only in Delhi but also at other part of country. But till protest grows anti national and anti society people of other religion start to persuade and convince Muslims to avoid such foolishness. Even Delhi high court sent mediators but protestors are continuously paid by Extremist group PFI. Protestors refused to accept CAA. Now this protestors mob arrested Delhi in unlawful manner. Protestors use to get nude in front of Hindu girls and they call them. (4)High court and Delhi government of AAP had not yet passed any order regarding protest then other than Muslims start to demonstrate in support of CAA where Kapil Mishra came in role. (5)Now it’s time where these two group of demonstrators came and stone pelting started. It’s Bheem army also came in suspicious role. But here there were pre prepared CAA protestors whose number grown in thousands with all arrangements made in advance. They marked Hindu, Jain and Sikh shops in advance and Muslim didn’t sent their kid to school on the day riot started. This planning was observed by few and video proofs are there. Now mob started rioting against common public. Wikipedia pages shown this mosque burnt but not shown Hindu temples damaged and burnt. More than 30 Hindus died with few Muslim. Few Muslims killed by Muslims due to some unknown reason or mistake. But killing of Hindus was brutal. Hindu girls returning from tuition were compelled to march nude to their home. Maximum loss is suffered by Hindus. IB cons table death was one of brutal incident who stabbed 400 times till 4 hours and his visceral organs were cut out from stomach, Suspect is AAP leader Tahir Hussain along with 4 more murders is now fugitive. Here Suspect names Shahrukh was not shown who fired eight round by pistol is also among fugitive. Riot indicates involvement of PFI with AAP and CONGRESS leaders. Riot was organised by professional killers.Congress leader Ishrat Jahan is now in police custody for provocative speech. There are 62 FIR till date and around 600 arrests. I dictated only a dilute version of this riot which was wrongly presented victim Hindu as culprits not in Wikipedia but also in Washington Post, BBC etc Rohitphy (talk) 18:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)