User talk:Roiartu

Welcome!

 * }

Please explain...
I understand the response below regarding copywrited material but can somebody PLEASE explain to me why every single one of my edits has been removed from the Max Gerson/Gerson Therapy entry? Please look at my edits, they have been fair and unbiased, replacing the highly opinionated language already in use (which somebody keeps reverting to). I understand that the Gerson Therapy is a controversial subject and as this is my very first experience with editing on Wikipedia now I'm actually a bit suspicious as to what is motivating someone to maintain the negative, anti-Gerson language that is prevalent on the page. Look for yourself! One example is my having added full context regarding a flawed study (as noted by the National Cancer Institute), whereas the entry that someone keeps insisting remain on the site is an INCOMPLETE, biased, and misleading statement (see ref #14). Also, I was criticized for using language such as "however" and told by an editor that this was "biased language." Well then, why is the word "However" which I attempted to remove and replace with more non-judgmental phraseology still used in the very first paragraph about Max Gerson?

RoiArtu


 * Contributing to Wikipedia articles on controversial subjects is extremely difficult for anyone. It requires a good understanding of the relevant policies and guidelines, as well as awareness of what problems have occurred in the past and their outcomes.
 * As brand-new editor you're at a huge disadvantage and can easily end up being blocked.
 * The links above can be overwhelming. There's so much to learn. If you're intent on editing articles like Max Gerson you'll need to learn a great deal very quickly. If you don't mind a bit of advice, I recommending working on other articles where there will be little pressure to learn Wikipedia. Also, I wish someone had pointed out The Missing Manual this essay when I was starting out as an editor here.
 * I see you've brought this up on the article talk page. That's the correct place. (Note that new discussions belong at the end of a talk page.)
 * So, let's continue this on the article talk page. Feel free to continue discussion here on the more general topics, or contact me on my talk page. --Ronz (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Max Gerson has been reverted. Your edit here to Max Gerson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FCJGNmmb0o) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  05:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yobol (talk) 05:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Max Gerson ‎, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)