User talk:Rojhan Kuyumcu

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Van Patten (September 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:James Van Patten may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Rojhan_Kuyumcu Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fade258&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Rojhan_Kuyumcu reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Draft:James Van Patten
First off, Wikipedia cannot use itself as a reference. Moreover, sites like Rotten Tomatoes and IDMb are not considered reliable sources since their content is user generated. Last but not least, your draft does not meet neutrality standards and is therefore unlikely to pass review. Kleuske (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Kleuske i wonder could you help me about publish the James Van Patten draft because i need the publish the page but my ip is blocked if you want to help me i will send you the text Rojhan Kuyumcu (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You are blocked. The instructions for appealing your block are in the block notice at the bottom of this page. You need an administrator to unblock you... although all I can say is, good luck with that! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Rojhan Kuyumcu, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello Rojhan Kuyumcu. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rojhan Kuyumcu. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:James Van Patten, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Rojhan Kuyumcu, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Van Patten has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Van Patten. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Van Patten has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Van Patten. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:James Van Patten


The page Draft:James Van Patten has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0887695/bio/?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm and https://vanpattenproductions.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Rojhan Kuyumcu, I've read your email. There's nothing in it that you couldn't have said here. If you want to be unblocked you may make an unblock request, following the instructions in the dirty orange template immediately above this. At the very least, you'll need to show understanding of our copyright policy, and of the rules governing paid editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)