User talk:Rokbloom

Category:Drum Corps
Rokbloom, thank you for your enthusiasm with editing drum corps related articles on Wikipedia. However, you might not have been aware that the category Drum Corps already existed and was intentionally deleted; its contents were moved to Category:Drum and bugle corps, which is a more correct name. The two categories should not exist side-by-side as they are redundant. I have place the Drum Corps category up for deletion.—Lazytiger 06:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the confusion, I wasnt aware of a new category, and just saw the red linked category on the project page. Sorry! >.< Rokbloom 16:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That's OK; I figured it was just a misunderstanding. We'll get it fixed up.—Lazytiger 17:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Manuel Munzlinger
A "" template has been added to the article Manuel Munzlinger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bencherlite 12:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Marching band
--Littledrummrboy 23:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Marigaux, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 09:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)