User talk:Rokr1

Hi
Please could you read WP:V. It is a mandatory policy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on previously published information, information that has been published by reliable sources. Your additions to the Zionism don't comply with the WP:V policy. That's why I reverted your edits.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 19:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I was unsure about it. I have not written any wrong information you can verify.

August 2013
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Zionism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Your edits are unsourced (replacing sourced content) and are off-topic for the section. Please do not use Wikipedia for editorializing.'' Hertz1888 (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Zionism, you may be blocked from editing. Dea db  eef  20:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

People agree with the histroy is what matters and its not my personal analysis, Everybody agrees with it. Okay I will stop... I do not know why you people disallow me from updating... However I have not included information which is false, kindly prove me if its false.

Its a open secret... You and I know the history and fact.


 * Your edits were unsupported by reliable sources, all the while deleting what sources were already there. Your own conjecture isn't constructive to the article, citations are. —  Richard  BB  20:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)