User talk:Rollinginhisgrave

September 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of common misconceptions. CactusRoy 🏴󠁣󠁡󠁱󠁣󠁿 ( talk ) 15:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * think I've been identified here by accident, I did justify the removal of material in the edit summary with reference to the talk page discussion (clearly a valid reason). Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 15:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Well I don't know about that, because I am a new editor. And not only that, but I am from Quebec and French is my language. Some fool anglos on this site believe since then I am not competent. Looks like the block is resolved - I am not sure who is correct here , I saw in the recent changes log 20 000 bytes removed and wanted to get the bloque

Best luck CactusRoy 🏴󠁣󠁡󠁱󠁣󠁿 ( talk ) 15:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Partial block
You have been blocked for one week from editing List of common misconceptions. Edit warring to remove swathes of content from the article and supporting it with formalistic wikilawyering on talk, such as, repeatedly, "Referred to in article as an urban legend rather than as common misconception", is pretty disruptive. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC).


 * Comment There is no reason to appeal if you will 'avoid editing the page', as the block applies only to that page. CactusRoy 🏴󠁣󠁡󠁱󠁣󠁿 ( talk ) 16:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * There are other edits I made which have been reverted not related to the urban legends point, including one on perfect pitch, where I noticed on the page for perfect pitch the cited 1/25 population figure refers to music students, not the general public; ironically the page for list of common misconceptions perpetuating misinformation. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello! I'm Sundayclose. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of common misconceptions appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 11:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of common misconceptions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The State Journal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Source you added to Thatching
I have reverted the source you added to Thatching because the newspaper article included whole sentences that were in the Wikipedia article before the newspaper article was published, an apparent case of copying from Wikipedia. Citing such a source in Wikipedia produces citogenesis, a form of circular sourcing. This is a growing problem, and one that I think needs more effort to inform editors about. Donald Albury 13:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

My apologies for reverting both citations. I should have just dealt with the one. I wasn't paying enough attention to what I was doing. It is always good to see someone improving sourcing in articles. - Donald Albury 17:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of common misconceptions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * (Though the burger is not nearly "smashed" enough!) Thanks again for reviewing, and happy editing. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Costello's
Thank you for the quick review. I've nominated the article for FAC, if you'd like to leave additional feedback or comments on the nomination page. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 21:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)