User talk:Rollpaperp

June 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I am here to build an encyclopedia that you are vandalizing. Go away!  Foreign election interference! Rollpaperp (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * May I please suggest that the next reviewing administrator would revoke the talk page access? Ymblanter (talk) 11:10, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * My edit is appropriate. Edward Davida is a candidate in this general election.  Multiple editors were wrong.  If multiple people say 2+2=5, that does not change the fact that 2+2=4


 * (ec) Somebody beat me to it but I want to post my reason anyway. I think the confusion here is that Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, and no such sources have been offered that Mr. Davida is a candidate.  Documents from the Arizona Secretary of State are a primary source. Anyone can turn in papers to be a write-in candidate. Mr. Davida is a write-in candidate and is not on the Republican primary ballot. If he receives sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources about his write-in candidacy, he can be mentioned. Otherwise no. In any event, you seem to be here to advocate for Mr. Davida and not collaborate with others to determine the content of the article. You edit warred and possibly socked to preserve your edits.  This is unacceptable, and I must come to the conclusion that the reason for the block is correct.  If you are here to build an encyclopedia, please tell us how you will do that and how your behavior will change going forward. If you are connected to Mr. Davida, please tell us how.
 * I was tempted to summarily decline this due to your "foreign election interference" comment. Wikipedia is a global project with editors from all over the world. Any editor may edit any article in good faith. If you use this page to attack other users again, your access to it will be removed. 331dot (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Since you are continuing your attacks despite my warning in your malformed request above, I am removing access. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC) If I move to Arizona and drop off my write in candidacy papers, I hope you fight as hard for me as you are for Mr. Davida. Again, anyone can do that. We need coverage that discusses it. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

UTRS

 * is now closed summarily for a personal attack. 331dot (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

is closed. Strike two! -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 08:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

"I have not abused any accounts. I did create a 2nd account because Ymblanter blocked me "
Creating a second account to evade a block is abusing multiple accounts. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 08:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

is closed. Strike 3. Banned from UTRS. Noting block evasion below. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)