User talk:Romancatholickochi

POV edit Vandalism
You have put insertions into the Pesaha Appam page without any scholarly references. This is POV edit and vandalism. POV edit has to be avoided Gajel (talk) 20:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Romancatholickochi!!!!, I noticed your edits in the page Pesaha Appam. Please understand that if your adding something to an article please provide reliable sources. If Latin Catholics have the custom of Pesaha Appam then please provide reliable sources to state that. According to all sources inferior castes like Latin Catholics and the New Christians (പുതു ക്രിസ്ത്യാനികൾ) do not have the tradition of Pesaha Appam. Th word "Pesaha" itself is an East Syriac word. It's stated clearly that Pesaha Appam us limited to the Saint Thomas Syrian Christians of Malabar. Please provide reliable sources as strong as the ones in the article when you have an addition to articles. thanks Micahhadar (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Your recent editing history at Pesaha Appam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Br Ibrahim john (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pesaha Appam. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Elizium23 (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Br Ibrahim john (talk) 03:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Pesaha Appam due to edit warring and the personal attacks in your most recent edit summary. Engaging in caste conflict or religious conflict is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please read Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  18:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Romancatholickochi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 16:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)