User talk:Romanophile

Welcome
 Hello Romanophile, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Romanophile, good luck, and have fun. – Shirt58 (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)


 * My labour tends to focus on lexicographical content rather than encyclopaedic content, so I’m not sure that I can be of much use here. I usually come here to post questions. But because of some unpleasant experiences in the past, I always expect somebody to ‘hat’ my topics and not tell me why because they think that it’s ‘obvious’ to me. I may as well use a casino. --Romanophile (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Monkey butt
Hey Romanophile! I just wanted to check that you had stuck around for your answer at WP:RDS. I now realize that BB was confused by the title of your question -- a link to the section and article where you expected to find the answer -- into thinking that you were asking a question more suited for that article's talk page than the reference desk. My note here was in response to BB's remark, but I meant what I said, that your question was well written and quite appropriate for the reference desk. Cheers! -- ToE 00:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) (I'm unable to resist this "Monkey butt" heading, in spite of Robert McClenon pointing out to me that Chimpanzees are not monkeys. Monkey butt!)

di niente
An easy one, "de nudda". :) --Dk1919 (talk) 21:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Milli gratzias. You could also say "gratzias medas". Forgive me for being a little blunt, but might I inquire as to the nature of your interest in Sardinian language, if I'm allowed to?--Dk1919 (talk) 11:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok! Scusa ancora per la domanda. :) Il tuo interesse per il sardo e le altre lingue mi fa molto piacere. Ad avercene in Italia persone come te ;) Saluti.--Dk1919 (talk) 13:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Bevida:1) part. pass. forte del verbo bere ("bevuta") 2) bevanda, bibita.--Dk1919 (talk) 00:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Sardinian
Ciao Romanophile (scusa se ti scrivo in italiano, mi pare che tu sia italofono), mi sono imbattuto in un sito sulla Sardegna e le sue lingue che certamente ti potrà interessare. Ecco qui]. Ha davvero un sacco di roba interessante, con tanto di vocabolari sulla lingua sarda nelle sue varianti e persino su quelle linguisticamente non sarde come il gallurese e l'algherese! Per non parlare dell'etimologia delle parole. Dacci un'occhiata. Saludos.--Dk1919 (talk) 23:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

what's with the parens?
I see that here you have enclosed your signature in Triple parentheses when making the statement "I’m surprised to find another echoer around here!". An immediate and satisfactory explanation (I doubt there is one, but I'm willing to listen) would probably be beneficial to avoid escalation. Herostratus (talk) 22:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Have you read the article you linked to? Quote: "In the wake of these actions, some users, both Jews and non-Jews, have intentionally placed their own names within triple parentheses as a sign of solidarity." (emphasis mine) See also User_talk:The_Quixotic_Potato. &#40;&#40;&#40;The Quixotic Potato&#41;&#41;&#41; (talk) 01:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, OK... I guess. No, had not seen that part. OK, forget it. Herostratus (talk) 02:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Ivaylo Ivanov (criminal)
Hi Romanophile, one of your references/sources of the your article above pointed to of New York Times where no exact article there - see here. There are several articles published by New York Times on Ivaylo Ivanov in the net, you might want to relink/recite the correct source in your article. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Elon Musk
I have removed your addition there, nothing in the biography supports him being a notable anti communist. Please feel free to open a talkpage discussion if you disagree, thanks Govindaharihari (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ivaylo Ivanov (criminal) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivaylo Ivanov (criminal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ivaylo Ivanov (criminal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)